Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CORSICA MARINA SECONDA

IMO: 7349039
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.49 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Forship SpA

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

110.2 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.7 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

134

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 547 (−75%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

642

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 233 (+176%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Ro-pax median 15.7 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,476 t

CO₂ emitted

11,091 t

11,262 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,561 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,539 h

106 days, 29% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2024

Set against all 404 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 110.2 kg/nm · median 150.7 (−27%)

73.1Ranks 99 of 404, lowest first236.5

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 15.7 (−21%)

11.7Faster than 14% of ro-pax ships22.4

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 134.34 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 546.68 (−75%)

58.42Ranks 106 of 404, lowest first1,957.32

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 641.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 232.85 (+176%)

30.83Ranks 306 of 404, lowest first1,069.25

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports74%
From the EU8%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU10%

92% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,184 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CORSICA MARINA SECONDA
Ro-pax median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CORSICA MARINA SECONDA
Ro-pax median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CORSICA MARINA SECONDA
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,0001,250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CORSICA MARINA SECONDA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+16%	+18%	−25%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	+1%	+17%	+1,038%	–	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.8 kn	−10%	−34%	−89%	–	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.4 kn	−2%	+28%	+41%	+76%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−4.3 kn	−2%	−29%	+178%	−2%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	−2%	+11%	−59%	−22%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Forship SpA	3,476	11,091	31,561	2,539	12.4	110.2	–	–
2023	not published	4,004	12,813	42,242	3,444	12.3	94.8	–	–
2022	not published	350	1,112	3,712	351	10.6	94.1	–	–
2021	not published	3,450	10,986	32,911	2,289	14.4	104.8	–	–
2020	not published	2,493	7,905	23,353	2,114	11.0	106.8	–	–
2019	not published	914	2,898	8,412	549	15.3	108.7	–	–
2018	not published	2,271	7,192	20,504	1,508	13.6	110.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2024	Forship SpA	134.34	546.68	−75%	106 of 404	641.69	232.85	+176%	RINA	C
2023	not published	172.42	680.04	−75%	88 of 386	535.23	233.94	+129%	RINA	C
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	RINA	C
2021	not published	136.63	815.19	−83%	79 of 377	554.18	226.00	+145%	RINA	C
2020	not published	77.54	750.91	−90%	57 of 387	860.35	217.49	+296%	RINA	C
2019	not published	78.90	569.03	−86%	64 of 394	797.36	222.56	+258%	RINA	C
2018	not published	101.09	728.92	−86%	66 of 361	1,037.18	184.05	+464%	RINA	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.