Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA NAUTICA

IMO
8317954
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Gothenburg
Technical efficiency
EEXI 33.58 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Scandinavia AB · part of Stena

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
90.5 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−40%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
1,415
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+150%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
168
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−34%)
Average speed
13.2 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−16%)
Fuel per day at sea
28.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
6,232 t
CO₂ emitted
19,648 t
19,954 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
68,863 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,227 h
218 days, 60% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 90.5 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−40%)
69.3Ranks 84 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)
12.0Faster than 19% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,414.50 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+150%)
66.76Ranks 359 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 168.35 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−34%)
48.59Ranks 154 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports92%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU8%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (19,648 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
8.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.3 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • STENA NAUTICA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • STENA NAUTICA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • STENA NAUTICA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • STENA NAUTICA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.2 kn+1%−0%−3%−4%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024−0.1 kn−3%−4%+5%+9%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023+0.0 kn+4%+4%−12%−16%Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+0.1 kn+1%+2%+5%−37%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021−0.8 kn−4%−8%−3%−11%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+1.1 kn+3%+12%+5%+176%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.1 kn−11%−2%+3%−30%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Stena Line Scandinavia AB6,23219,64868,8635,22713.290.5––
2024Stena Line Scandinavia AB6,31919,92370,7345,27813.489.3––
2023not published6,23519,65667,5994,99713.592.2––
2022not published6,80321,44376,5385,67013.588.9––
2021not published6,35920,38672,6205,40013.487.6––
2020not published6,77321,34274,5855,25314.290.8––
2019not published6,21619,58770,7685,39813.187.8––
2018not published6,75221,30368,7765,72012.098.2––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Stena Line Scandinavia AB1,414.50566.51+150%359 of 408168.35253.18−34%DNVC
2024Stena Line Scandinavia AB1,469.20546.68+169%343 of 404174.43232.85−25%DNVC
2023not published1,344.28680.04+98%330 of 386183.94233.94−21%DNVC
2022not published1,599.75626.32+155%354 of 394180.52252.90−29%DNVC
2021not published2,547.72815.19+213%349 of 377159.86226.00−29%DNVC
2020not published2,859.62750.91+281%356 of 387125.15217.49−42%Lloyd's RegisterA
2019not published1,037.03569.03+82%295 of 394105.79222.56−52%Lloyd's Register–
2018not published1,481.29728.92+103%272 of 361113.70184.05−38%Lloyd's RegisterC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

STENA NAUTICA (IMO 8317954): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze