Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

GOLDEN BRIDGE

IMO: 8902345
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 32.24 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: A-Ships Management SA

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

151.8

Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,170

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+283%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

526

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+108%)

Average speed

16.8 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

61.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,280 t

CO₂ emitted

32,958 t

33,463 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

67,729 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,025 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 151.8 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+1%)

69.3Ranks 210 of 408, lowest first232.4

Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 15.8 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 61% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 2,169.60 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+283%)

66.76Ranks 387 of 408, lowest first1,568.87

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 525.68 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+108%)

48.59Ranks 279 of 408, lowest first1,247.19

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU6%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU5%

16% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,197 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,506 t

4.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+505 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

GOLDEN BRIDGE
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+3%	+5%	−0%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−3.3 kn	−5%	−20%	+13%	–	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+3.0 kn	−0%	+18%	−22%	–	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+3.4 kn	+9%	+37%	+38%	+106%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.4 kn	−7%	−21%	+68%	−62%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	−18%	−25%	+0%	+90%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	A-Ships Management SA	10,280	32,958	67,729	4,025	16.8	151.8	–	–
2024	A-Ships Management SA	10,056	31,892	68,062	4,144	16.4	147.7	–	–
2023	not published	9,299	29,069	60,039	3,050	19.7	154.9	–	–
2022	not published	11,961	37,763	77,127	4,612	16.7	155.1	–	–
2021	not published	7,952	25,109	55,875	4,211	13.3	142.3	–	–
2020	not published	5,103	16,127	33,306	2,123	15.7	153.2	–	–
2019	not published	6,235	19,529	33,204	1,938	17.1	187.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	A-Ships Management SA	2,169.60	566.51	+283%	387 of 408	525.68	253.18	+108%	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	A-Ships Management SA	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	4,978.22	626.32	+695%	390 of 394	1,134.08	252.90	+348%	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	2,420.11	815.19	+197%	345 of 377	485.49	226.00	+115%	ICS Verification Services	A
2020	not published	6,350.50	750.91	+746%	376 of 387	585.92	217.49	+169%	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	3,336.86	569.03	+486%	377 of 394	2,592.44	222.56	+1,065%	ICS Verification Services	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.