Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

MIMER

IMO: 9002647
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 517 t
Port of registry: Braendoe
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Oy Trailer-Link AB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 517 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

34.1 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−67%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

212

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+122%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−28%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,234 t

CO₂ emitted

3,955 t

4,016 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

36,185 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,492 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 34.1 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−67%)

56.6Ranks 5 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 14.4 (−28%)

10.9Faster than 7% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 211.61 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+122%)

47.35Ranks 185 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU43%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU5%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,277 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MIMER
Ro-ro median

20.040.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MIMER
Ro-ro median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MIMER
Ro-ro median

0.0100200300400500

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.2 kn	−6%	+6%	+112%	+79%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+4%	+5%	+7%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+6%	+1%	+7%	+17%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−11%	−10%	−14%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+20%	+22%	+5%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−15%	−12%	−27%	−70%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−14%	+0%	−29%	−31%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Oy Trailer-Link AB	1,234	3,955	36,185	3,492	10.4	34.1	211.61	–
2024	Oy Trailer-Link AB	623	1,997	17,099	1,866	9.2	36.4	118.21	–
2023	not published	559	1,792	15,925	1,768	9.0	35.1	113.23	–
2022	not published	491	1,575	14,889	1,570	9.5	33.0	96.57	–
2021	not published	638	2,045	17,296	1,855	9.3	36.9	106.06	–
2020	not published	508	1,630	16,489	1,792	9.2	30.8	97.91	–
2019	not published	821	2,632	22,640	2,548	8.9	36.3	322.65	–
2018	not published	1,333	4,275	31,730	4,175	7.6	42.0	470.17	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Oy Trailer-Link AB	211.61	95.19	+122%	185 of 235	DNV	B+C
2024	Oy Trailer-Link AB	118.21	97.53	+21%	127 of 220	DNV	B
2023	not published	113.23	108.62	+4%	115 of 221	DNV	B
2022	not published	96.57	90.62	+7%	123 of 223	DNV	B
2021	not published	106.06	103.64	+2%	115 of 219	DNV	B
2020	not published	97.91	102.77	−5%	110 of 238	DNV	B
2019	not published	322.65	90.89	+255%	252 of 271	DNV	B
2018	not published	470.17	91.03	+417%	253 of 260	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.