Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

NORBANK

IMO: 9056583
Type: Ro-pax ship
Port of registry: Rotterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

131.3 kg/nm

Ro-pax median 150.7 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

3,425

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 547 (+527%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

257

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 233 (+10%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Ro-pax median 15.7 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,980 t

CO₂ emitted

31,491 t

31,981 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

75,999 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,833 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2024

Set against all 404 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 131.3 kg/nm · median 150.7 (−13%)

73.1Ranks 146 of 404, lowest first236.5

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 15.7 (+0%)

11.7Faster than 50% of ro-pax ships22.4

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 3,425.39 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 546.68 (+527%)

58.42Ranks 376 of 404, lowest first1,957.32

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 256.84 g CO₂/t·nm · median 232.85 (+10%)

30.83Ranks 213 of 404, lowest first1,069.25

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU49%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,358 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NORBANK
Ro-pax median

130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

NORBANK
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

NORBANK
Ro-pax median

150175200225250275

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

NORBANK
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2024	+1.0 kn	−4%	+3%	+8%	+573%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+3%	+5%	+15%	−30%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−5%	−6%	−13%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−8%	−2%	−1%	+40%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	−6%	−14%	−5%	–	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	3,216	10,107	27,657	1,784	15.5	116.3	–	–
2024	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	9,980	31,491	75,999	4,833	15.7	131.3	–	–
2022	not published	9,650	30,164	70,644	4,812	14.7	136.6	–	–
2021	not published	8,212	25,622	61,687	4,309	14.3	133.1	–	–
2020	not published	9,977	31,154	71,098	4,922	14.4	140.3	–	–
2019	not published	10,873	33,983	71,551	5,264	13.6	152.0	–	–
2018	not published	12,168	37,985	75,395	5,046	14.9	161.4	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2024	P&O Ferries Holdings Ltd	3,425.39	546.68	+527%	376 of 404	256.84	232.85	+10%	DNV	B
2022	not published	508.94	626.32	−19%	178 of 394	174.46	252.90	−31%	DNV	B
2021	not published	725.09	815.19	−11%	176 of 377	169.37	226.00	−25%	DNV	B
2020	not published	599.39	750.91	−20%	169 of 387	165.78	217.49	−24%	DNV	B
2019	not published	428.01	569.03	−25%	161 of 394	199.70	222.56	−10%	DNV	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.