Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VIZZAVONA

IMO
9138006
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Marseille
Technical efficiency
EEXI 27.99 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CORSICA LINEA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
148.7 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (−1%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
429
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−24%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
346
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+37%)
Average speed
14.7 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−7%)
Fuel per day at sea
52.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
8,687 t
CO₂ emitted
27,220 t
27,647 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
58,427 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,983 h
166 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 148.7 kg/nm · median 150.2 (−1%)
69.3Ranks 198 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 15.8 (−7%)
12.0Faster than 35% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 429.13 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−24%)
66.76Ranks 173 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 345.60 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+37%)
48.59Ranks 230 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports81%
  • From the EU1%
  • Into the EU1%
  • At berth in the EU17%

99% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (26,991 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
17.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.4 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • VIZZAVONA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • VIZZAVONA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VIZZAVONA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VIZZAVONA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.6 kn−6%−9%−8%+39%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+1.8 kn−9%+2%+13%−9%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−3.1 kn+7%−13%−24%+13%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.5 kn−5%−8%+14%+1%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021+2.0 kn+1%+15%+14%−26%2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−2.5 kn−2%−16%−35%−60%2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.3 kn−1%+1%+14%+334%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025CORSICA LINEA8,68727,22058,4273,98314.7148.7––
2024CORSICA LINEA10,00831,33863,5734,16115.3157.4––
2023not published9,79730,65956,3634,17513.5173.8––
2022not published12,02837,56074,2824,47716.6161.9––
2021not published11,11734,73065,2293,81417.1170.4––
2020not published9,59530,01957,1553,78915.1167.9––
2019not published15,07347,06187,5174,96617.6172.2––
2018not published13,37641,79176,8414,45517.3174.1––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025CORSICA LINEA429.13566.51−24%173 of 408345.60253.18+37%VerifaviaC
2024CORSICA LINEA309.31546.68−43%145 of 404264.74232.85+14%VerifaviaC
2023not published338.45680.04−50%119 of 386324.31233.94+39%VerifaviaC
2022not published298.99626.32−52%124 of 394271.11252.90+7%VerifaviaB+C
2021not published296.83815.19−64%115 of 377283.04226.00+25%VerifaviaB+C
2020not published400.37750.91−47%131 of 387316.81217.49+46%VerifaviaB+C
2019not published991.26569.03+74%285 of 394197.02222.56−11%VerifaviaB+C
2018not published228.59728.92−69%102 of 361441.46184.05+140%VerifaviaB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.