Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

STENA GERMANICA

IMO
9145176
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Gothenburg
Technical efficiency
EEXI 16.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line Scandinavia AB · part of Stena

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
159.5 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+6%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
434
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−23%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
107
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−58%)
Average speed
15.6 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−1%)
Fuel per day at sea
59.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,682 t
CO₂ emitted
43,756 t
44,428 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
85,785 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,500 h
229 days, 63% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 159.5 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+6%)
69.3Ranks 238 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 15.8 (−1%)
12.0Faster than 47% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 434.35 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (−23%)
66.76Ranks 177 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 107.42 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−58%)
48.59Ranks 100 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports96%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU4%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (43,756 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.7 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • STENA GERMANICA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • STENA GERMANICA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • STENA GERMANICA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • STENA GERMANICA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.0 kn+3%+2%−0%−0%Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.0 kn−0%+0%+5%+3%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023−0.1 kn−5%−6%−4%−14%Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−0.1 kn+4%+3%−0%−35%Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.0 kn−7%−7%+10%−30%Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.1 kn−6%−6%−9%+138%Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.2 kn−2%−1%+2%−14%Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Stena Line Scandinavia AB13,68243,75685,7855,50015.6159.5––
2024Stena Line Scandinavia AB13,39942,95886,1025,50715.6155.6––
2023not published12,78840,37882,0775,25315.6155.8––
2022not published14,10745,22585,7205,45315.7164.6––
2021not published13,60443,53985,8225,44215.8158.5––
2020LNGnot published13,36439,35978,0904,95215.8171.1––
2019LNGnot published15,62944,11285,8705,47015.7182.0––
2018LNGnot published15,75544,27084,5085,43915.5186.4––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Stena Line Scandinavia AB434.35566.51−23%177 of 408107.42253.18−58%DNVC
2024Stena Line Scandinavia AB434.39546.68−21%180 of 404106.67232.85−54%DNVC
2023not published422.45680.04−38%138 of 38690.15233.94−61%DNVC
2022not published493.89626.32−21%175 of 39494.22252.90−63%DNVC
2021not published765.05815.19−6%181 of 37784.65226.00−63%DNVC
2020LNGnot published1,094.99750.91+46%233 of 38777.95217.49−64%Lloyd's RegisterA
2019LNGnot published460.39569.03−19%173 of 39468.54222.56−69%Lloyd's Register–
2018LNGnot published538.46728.92−26%153 of 361129.27184.05−30%Lloyd's RegisterC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.