Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

EXCELSIOR

IMO
9184419
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Palermo
Technical efficiency
EIV 25.93 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grandi Navi Veloci Spa

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
207.0 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+38%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
936
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+65%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
0.08
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−100%)
Average speed
18.7 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+18%)
Fuel per day at sea
92.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
22,893 t
CO₂ emitted
71,334 t
72,458 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
110,572 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,918 h
247 days, 68% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 207.0 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+38%)
69.3Ranks 341 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 18.7 kn · median 15.8 (+18%)
12.0Faster than 75% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 936.10 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+65%)
66.76Ranks 284 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 0.08 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (−100%)
48.59Ranks 4 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports31%
  • From the EU31%
  • Into the EU32%
  • At berth in the EU5%

68% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (48,838 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
1.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • EXCELSIOR
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • EXCELSIOR
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • EXCELSIOR
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • EXCELSIOR
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−1.7 kn−9%−16%+1%+68,228%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+1.0 kn−3%+1%−3%−100%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.5 kn−1%−4%−1%−17%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022+0.2 kn+9%+11%+30%+15%Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.2 kn+3%+10%+2%−43%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−2.0 kn−5%−14%−19%+94%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.6 kn−4%−7%−21%−13%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa22,89371,334110,5725,91818.7207.0––
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa24,89177,555109,6625,37820.4227.0––
2023not published26,65283,050113,4605,84419.4234.9––
2022not published27,17984,667114,0845,73719.9238.2––
2021not published19,12959,97687,9184,46919.7217.6––
2020not published18,11156,52385,7854,64118.5211.1––
2019not published23,38772,915105,7905,15020.5221.1––
2018not published30,79795,998133,5716,32621.1230.6––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Grandi Navi Veloci Spa936.10566.51+65%284 of 4080.08253.18−100%RINAA
2024Grandi Navi Veloci Spa1.37546.68−100%11 of 4041.37232.85−99%RINAA
2023not published934.74680.04+37%247 of 386102.79233.94−56%RINAA
2022not published1,131.35626.32+81%299 of 39487.10252.90−66%RINAA+B
2021not published985.36815.19+21%218 of 37764.22226.00−72%RINAA+B
2020not published1,728.23750.91+130%311 of 38778.54217.49−64%RINAA+B
2019not published891.08569.03+57%261 of 39479.04222.56−64%RINAA+B
2018not published1,028.09728.92+41%231 of 36166.51184.05−64%RINAA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.