Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

BENTAYGA CARGO

IMO: 9207883
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 756 t
Port of registry: Las Palmas
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super
Former names: FINNKRAFT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Fred. Olsen, S.A. · part of Fred. Olsen

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 756 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

130.1 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

541

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+469%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

45.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,080 t

CO₂ emitted

19,112 t

19,410 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

46,724 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,181 h

133 days, 36% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 130.1 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+24%)

56.6Ranks 175 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

10.9Faster than 54% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 541.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+469%)

47.35Ranks 226 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BENTAYGA CARGO
Ro-ro median

90.0100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BENTAYGA CARGO
Ro-ro median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BENTAYGA CARGO
Ro-ro median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.6 kn	+9%	+33%	−30%	+49%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−4.8 kn	+23%	−12%	−33%	+153%	4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	−6%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+0%	−3%	+5%	+14%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−3%	−0%	+9%	−9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+0%	−1%	−3%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−2%	−2%	−2%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	6,080	19,112	46,724	3,181	14.7	130.1	541.17	–
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	2,490	7,788	24,166	1,411	17.1	103.0	148.21	–
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	8,013	25,050	67,222	5,551	12.1	119.2	363.20	–
2023	not published	9,791	30,571	100,759	5,960	16.9	97.2	143.74	–
2022	not published	11,161	34,824	107,068	6,325	16.9	104.2	143.51	–
2021	not published	10,634	33,180	102,286	5,880	17.4	104.0	126.05	–
2020	not published	10,054	31,370	93,856	5,528	17.0	107.1	139.13	–
2019	not published	10,400	32,448	97,124	5,687	17.1	107.1	144.85	–
2018	not published	10,909	34,042	99,338	5,860	17.0	109.8	142.76	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	541.17	95.19	+469%	226 of 235	DNV	A
2024part-year	Finnlines Plc	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2024	Fred. Olsen, S.A.	363.20	97.53	+272%	204 of 220	RINA	B
2023	not published	143.74	108.62	+32%	142 of 221	RINA	B
2022	not published	143.51	90.62	+58%	163 of 223	RINA	A+B
2021	not published	126.05	103.64	+22%	141 of 219	RINA	–
2020	not published	139.13	102.77	+35%	153 of 238	RINA	A+B
2019	not published	144.85	90.89	+59%	197 of 271	RINA	A+B
2018	not published	142.76	91.03	+57%	192 of 260	RINA	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.