Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

STENA FORERUNNER

IMO: 9227259
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,171 t
Port of registry: Hoek Van Holland
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.26 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stena Line BV · part of Stena

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,171 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

116.7 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

168

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+77%)

Average speed

13.1 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,892 t

CO₂ emitted

12,172 t

12,363 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

33,352 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,552 h

106 days, 29% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 116.7 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+12%)

56.6Ranks 151 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 14.4 (−9%)

10.9Faster than 31% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 168.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+77%)

47.35Ranks 171 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU46%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU7%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,554 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

STENA FORERUNNER
Ro-ro median

100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA FORERUNNER
Ro-ro median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA FORERUNNER
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−0%	+2%	−43%	−9%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−1%	+0%	+4%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−20%	−27%	−2%	+0%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−0%	−4%	−2%	−3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	−35%	−30%	+40%	−40%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.4 kn	+45%	+23%	−31%	+79%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 45%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.8 kn	+7%	+40%	+17%	+74%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Stena Line BV	3,892	12,172	33,352	2,552	13.1	116.7	168.13	–
2024	Stena Line BV	6,837	21,379	58,426	4,588	12.7	117.0	184.26	–
2023	not published	6,651	20,845	56,375	4,468	12.6	118.0	169.14	–
2022	not published	8,499	26,448	57,619	4,177	13.8	147.5	168.94	–
2021	not published	8,661	27,073	58,605	4,093	14.3	147.8	173.59	–
2020	not published	9,544	29,940	41,864	3,169	13.2	228.0	287.24	83%
2019	not published	9,621	30,105	61,100	3,913	15.6	157.5	160.54	93%
2018	not published	7,723	24,179	52,263	4,414	11.8	147.8	92.46	91%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stena Line BV	168.13	95.19	+77%	171 of 235	DNV	C
2024	Stena Line BV	184.26	97.53	+89%	170 of 220	DNV	C
2023	not published	169.14	108.62	+56%	157 of 221	DNV	C
2022	not published	168.94	90.62	+86%	174 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	173.59	103.64	+67%	161 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	287.24	102.77	+179%	212 of 238	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	160.54	90.89	+77%	205 of 271	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	92.46	91.03	+2%	136 of 260	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.