Navalyze · Container · Ship

LARS D

IMO: 9252797
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,121 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.42 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AVERA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,121 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.0

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

69.09

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (+294%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,889 t

CO₂ emitted

5,903 t

5,996 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

27,374 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,290 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.0 kg/nm · median 167.2 (−59%)

78.9Ranks 89 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 13.5 (−11%)

9.6Faster than 28% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 69.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (+294%)

7.33Ranks 1,903 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports42%
From the EU35%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU4%

27% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,617 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

247 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+93 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LARS D
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

LARS D
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LARS D
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−9%	+5%	−54%	+73%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+7%	−2%	−5%	+5%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−6%	−4%	+13%	−21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−4%	−3%	+8%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−5%	+10%	−6%	−5%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.8 kn	−0%	+67%	+66%	−16%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	965	3,013	12,280	1,115	11.0	78.6	50.02	–
2024	Drevin Bereederungs-GmbH & Co. KG	1,889	5,903	27,374	2,290	12.0	69.0	69.09	–
2023	not published	4,510	14,070	59,173	5,757	10.3	76.2	39.94	–
2022	not published	4,422	13,797	62,227	5,561	11.2	71.1	37.93	–
2021	not published	4,155	12,962	55,156	4,991	11.1	75.3	48.00	–
2020	not published	4,003	12,499	50,965	4,665	10.9	78.5	41.66	–
2019	not published	4,483	13,995	54,011	5,765	9.4	83.0	43.84	–
2018	not published	2,708	8,464	32,458	5,827	5.6	83.4	52.29	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	Schiffahrtskontor tom Worden GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Drevin Bereederungs-GmbH & Co. KG	69.09	17.52	+294%	1,903 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	39.94	19.40	+106%	1,538 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	37.93	19.13	+98%	1,449 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	48.00	17.90	+168%	1,574 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	41.66	17.58	+137%	1,499 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	43.84	18.88	+132%	1,480 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	52.29	20.22	+159%	1,516 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.