Navalyze · General cargo · Ship
PROPEL PROSPERITY
- IMO
- 9317690
- Type
- General cargo ship
- Port of registry
- Singapore
- Technical efficiency
- EIV 6.09 g CO₂/t·nm
- Former names
- AEC ABILITY II
ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd
2025 at a glance
From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.
Within the general cargo fleet, 2025
Set against all 2,707 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.
Where the emissions happen, 2025
THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.
- Between EU ports30%
- From the EU57%
- Into the EU7%
- At berth in the EU6%
0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).
Over the years
Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.
Fuel kg/nm
- PROPEL PROSPERITY
- General cargo median
Average speed, kn
- PROPEL PROSPERITY
- General cargo median
CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm
- PROPEL PROSPERITY
- General cargo median
Year on year
| Year | Average speed | Fuel kg/nm | Fuel per day at sea | Distance | CO₂ per transport work | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024→2025 | +0.0 kn | −22% | −22% | −5% | −25% | Same speed, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
| 2023→2024 | −0.9 kn | +7% | −2% | −33% | +92% | 0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2022→2023 | −0.7 kn | −14% | −20% | +5% | +5% | 0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change. |
| 2021→2022 | +0.9 kn | +22% | +33% | +78% | – | 0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; in line with the speed change. |
| 2019→2021 | −1.1 kn | −11% | −19% | +826% | – | 1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade). |
| 2018→2019 | +1.3 kn | +12% | +26% | −97% | +354% | 1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade). |
Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.
Every reporting year
One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.
Operation
| Year | ISM company | Fuel t | CO₂ t | Distance nm | Hours at seah | Average speedknots at sea | Fuel kg/nmthis ship | CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship | Laden fuel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025part-year | Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd | 461 | 1,461 | 7,063 | 727 | 9.7 | 65.2 | – | – |
| 2025 | Su-Nav International Pvt Ltd | 461 | 1,461 | 7,063 | 727 | 9.7 | 65.2 | – | – |
| 2024part-year | V.Ships Ship Management (India) Pvt Ltd | 307 | 965 | 3,068 | 338 | 9.1 | 100.2 | 16.62 | – |
| 2024 | Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd | 624 | 1,957 | 7,448 | 768 | 9.7 | 83.8 | 33.68 | – |
| 2023 | not published | 873 | 2,760 | 11,196 | 1,057 | 10.6 | 78.0 | – | – |
| 2022 | not published | 968 | 3,046 | 10,639 | 938 | 11.3 | 91.0 | – | – |
| 2021 | not published | 445 | 1,391 | 5,992 | 575 | 10.4 | 74.3 | 9.33 | – |
| 2019 | not published | 54 | 169 | 647 | 56 | 11.5 | 83.2 | – | – |
| 2018 | not published | 1,561 | 4,899 | 20,946 | 2,046 | 10.2 | 74.5 | – | – |
Benchmark and verification
| Year | ISM company | CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm | General cargo median | vs General cargo | Rank | Verifier | Methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025part-year | Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd | – | – | – | – | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2025 | Su-Nav International Pvt Ltd | 16.32 | 25.46 | −36% | 531 of 2,707 | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2024part-year | V.Ships Ship Management (India) Pvt Ltd | – | – | – | – | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2024 | Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd | 21.86 | 19.25 | +14% | 663 of 1,111 | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2023 | not published | 11.37 | 20.67 | −45% | 230 of 1,045 | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2022 | not published | 10.81 | 21.57 | −50% | 154 of 1,034 | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2021 | not published | – | – | – | – | Lloyd's Register | B |
| 2019 | not published | 28.32 | 24.96 | +13% | 697 of 1,154 | DNV | C |
| 2018 | not published | 6.24 | 24.89 | −75% | 13 of 1,044 | DNV | C |
Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.