Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ECOATLANTIC

IMO: 9347932
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 34,443 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.28 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: THRASHER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 34,443 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

114.8

Bulk carrier median 84.6 kg/nm (+36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.09 (+30%)

Average speed

9.8 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.6 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

480 t

CO₂ emitted

1,517 t

1,540 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,178 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

427 h

18 days, 5% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 114.8 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+36%)

61.8Ranks 2,734 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 10.6 (−8%)

8.8Faster than 23% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+30%)

4.85Ranks 2,243 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU24%
Into the EU74%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (776 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

34 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+23 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ECOATLANTIC
Bulk carrier median

0.050.0100.0150.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ECOATLANTIC
Bulk carrier median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ECOATLANTIC
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+27%	+16%	−68%	+2%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−175.0 kn	+1,608%	−1%	−87%	−13%	175.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 1,608%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+174.4 kn	−94%	−7%	+818%	+70%	174.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 94%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−29%	−27%	+114%	−39%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+5%	+6%	+57%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	+27%	+19%	−59%	−35%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd	66	213	573	77	7.4	116.1	–	–
2024	Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd	480	1,517	4,178	427	9.8	114.8	10.54	–
2023	not published	1,176	3,684	12,989	1,214	10.7	90.5	10.37	–
2022	not published	540	1,712	102,470	552	185.7	5.3	11.95	–
2021	not published	1,044	3,296	11,164	985	11.3	93.5	7.05	–
2020	not published	688	2,171	5,225	474	11.0	131.8	11.49	–
2019	not published	416	1,307	3,320	306	10.9	125.4	15.48	–
2018	not published	789	2,463	8,015	691	11.6	98.5	23.97	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd	10.54	8.09	+30%	2,243 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	10.37	8.27	+25%	2,448 of 3,548	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	11.95	8.71	+37%	2,992 of 3,968	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	7.05	8.57	−18%	1,012 of 3,466	ICS Verification Services	A
2020	not published	11.49	8.24	+39%	2,492 of 3,150	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	15.48	8.38	+85%	3,024 of 3,360	ICS Verification Services	A
2018	not published	23.97	8.50	+182%	3,255 of 3,384	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.