Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MARIA G

IMO: 9358369
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 17,839 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.07 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FCN MANAGEMENT INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,839 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

85.7

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+4%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.18

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+92%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,148 t

CO₂ emitted

6,787 t

6,892 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,062 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,491 h

104 days, 28% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+4%)

61.0Ranks 2,047 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.7 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 30% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+92%)

4.80Ranks 3,202 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU40%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU4%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,960 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

252 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+105 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARIA G
Bulk carrier median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARIA G
Bulk carrier median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARIA G
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.520.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−2%	−6%	+27%	+54%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+9%	+1%	−8%	−26%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	−10%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−7%	−1%	+5%	−34%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	−4%	+7%	−15%	+56%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+6%	+0%	+56%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−5%	−1%	−40%	−23%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	2,148	6,787	25,062	2,491	10.1	85.7	15.18	–
2024	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	1,718	5,400	19,719	1,877	10.5	87.1	9.83	–
2023	not published	1,701	5,343	21,354	1,869	11.4	79.6	13.21	–
2022	not published	1,949	6,189	23,828	2,080	11.5	81.8	11.85	–
2021	not published	1,997	6,283	22,715	2,102	10.8	87.9	17.83	–
2020	not published	2,447	7,673	26,707	2,748	9.7	91.6	11.44	–
2019	not published	1,486	4,662	17,119	1,675	10.2	86.8	12.02	–
2018	not published	2,615	8,198	28,573	2,919	9.8	91.5	15.55	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	15.18	7.89	+92%	3,202 of 3,610	DNV	A
2024	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	9.83	8.09	+22%	2,094 of 3,089	DNV	A
2023	not published	13.21	8.27	+60%	2,931 of 3,548	DNV	A
2022	not published	11.85	8.71	+36%	2,972 of 3,968	DNV	A
2021	not published	17.83	8.57	+108%	3,237 of 3,466	DNV	A
2020	not published	11.44	8.24	+39%	2,485 of 3,150	DNV	A
2019	not published	12.02	8.38	+43%	2,688 of 3,360	DNV	A
2018	not published	15.55	8.50	+83%	3,019 of 3,384	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.