Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MOTELE OLA

IMO: 9399492
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 64,870 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CASCADE SPIRIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Grander Ship Management LLP

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 64,870 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

148.0

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.18

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−10%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,915 t

CO₂ emitted

21,763 t

22,103 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

46,725 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,383 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 148.0 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+15%)

76.1Ranks 1,146 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.7 (+0%)

8.0Faster than 48% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−10%)

4.51Ranks 686 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU44%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU6%

20% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,394 t).

Fuel burned laden

1,231 t

18% of all fuel; 82% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,341 t

6.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+340 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MOTELE OLA
Oil tanker median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MOTELE OLA
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MOTELE OLA
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+25%	+28%	+510%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−35%	−32%	+33%	+39%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	+10%	−0%	−65%	−18%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−2.6 kn	−2%	−21%	+83%	−32%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	−8%	+13%	−32%	+115%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+2%	−2%	−15%	−0%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Grander Ship Management LLP	6,915	21,763	46,725	4,383	10.7	148.0	7.18	18%
2024	Teekay Marine (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	911	2,854	7,665	739	10.4	118.8	6.94	–
2023	not published	1,047	3,304	5,769	573	10.1	181.5	4.99	–
2022	not published	2,711	8,470	16,448	1,480	11.1	164.8	6.06	–
2020	not published	1,515	4,739	8,990	656	13.7	168.5	8.89	–
2019	not published	2,442	7,639	13,309	1,199	11.1	183.5	4.13	–
2018	not published	2,814	8,824	15,709	1,355	11.6	179.1	4.14	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Grander Ship Management LLP	7.18	7.95	−10%	686 of 1,665	ABS	B+C
2024	Teekay Marine (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.	6.94	8.06	−14%	663 of 1,787	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	4.99	8.44	−41%	223 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	6.06	8.51	−29%	471 of 1,961	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	8.89	9.03	−2%	909 of 1,870	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	4.13	8.83	−53%	150 of 1,919	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	4.14	8.86	−53%	171 of 1,779	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.