Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

THEO G

IMO: 9415246
Type: Bulk carrier
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: TRUDY, THEA G

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FCN MANAGEMENT INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

185.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

–

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

11.2 kn

Fuel per day at sea

49.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

467 t

CO₂ emitted

1,482 t

1,505 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

2,526 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

226 h

9 days, 3% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.7 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−16%)

61.8Ranks 723 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.6 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 60% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+41%)

4.85Ranks 2,428 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU98%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

27 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+23 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

THEO G
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

THEO G
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

THEO G
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+162%	+170%	−90%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 162%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−6%	−10%	+9%	−23%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	−29%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+2%	+0%	−0%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+4%	+7%	+10%	+25%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	+65%	−14%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	+7%	+9%	−62%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	467	1,482	2,526	226	11.2	185.1	–	–
2025	EKA DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	467	1,482	2,526	226	11.2	185.1	–	–
2024	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	1,768	5,555	25,022	2,301	10.9	70.7	11.44	–
2023	not published	1,735	5,453	23,030	2,033	11.3	75.3	14.88	–
2022	not published	2,538	7,951	32,258	2,890	11.2	78.7	13.23	–
2021	not published	2,482	7,778	32,271	2,843	11.4	76.9	13.87	69%
2020	not published	2,183	6,848	29,438	2,653	11.1	74.2	11.13	–
2019	not published	1,466	4,625	17,879	1,608	11.1	82.0	12.87	–
2018	not published	3,575	11,193	46,767	4,271	10.9	76.4	13.26	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	EKA DENIZCILIK LTD. STI.	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	B
2024	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	11.44	8.09	+41%	2,428 of 3,089	DNV	A
2023	not published	14.88	8.27	+80%	3,080 of 3,548	DNV	A
2022	not published	13.23	8.71	+52%	3,198 of 3,968	Swiss Climate	C
2021	not published	13.87	8.57	+62%	2,995 of 3,466	ABS	B
2020	not published	11.13	8.24	+35%	2,426 of 3,150	ABS	B
2019	not published	12.87	8.38	+54%	2,789 of 3,360	ABS	B
2018	not published	13.26	8.50	+56%	2,846 of 3,384	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.