Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

LAKER 2

IMO: 9447782
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 3,925 t
Port of registry: Freetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: DORADO PLUS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: LLC " MARINE TRANS MANAGEMENT"

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,925 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

41.3 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

0.19

g CO₂/dwt·nm

Average speed

4.9 kn

Fuel per day at sea

4.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

446 t

CO₂ emitted

1,409 t

1,431 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,797 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,221 h

93 days, 25% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 43.8 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−25%)

34.9Ranks 309 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 6.3 kn · median 10.5 (−40%)

7.8Faster than 4% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 28.77 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.25 (+49%)

7.51Ranks 875 of 1,111, lowest first39.26

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports42%
From the EU33%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU8%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LAKER 2
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LAKER 2
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

LAKER 2
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−6%	−27%	−12%	–	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+23%	+14%	−53%	+20%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	−0%	+4%	+81%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+10%	−11%	−62%	+55%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−7%	−2%	+31%	−43%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−4%	−14%	−7%	−12%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+0%	−7%	−2%	−14%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	LLC " MARINE TRANS MANAGEMENT"	446	1,409	10,797	2,221	4.9	41.3	33.25	–
2025	KM Ship Management SIA	446	1,409	10,797	2,221	4.9	41.3	33.25	–
2024	LLC " MARINE TRANS MANAGEMENT"	538	1,697	12,269	1,950	6.3	43.8	35.17	–
2023	not published	942	2,984	26,380	3,882	6.8	35.7	28.17	–
2022	not published	520	1,636	14,543	2,211	6.6	35.8	28.49	–
2021	not published	1,241	3,890	38,023	4,732	8.0	32.6	26.02	–
2020	not published	1,011	3,200	28,927	3,784	7.6	34.9	30.85	–
2019	not published	1,126	3,531	31,121	3,652	8.5	36.2	30.42	–
2018	not published	1,145	3,593	31,702	3,423	9.3	36.1	35.28	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	LLC " MARINE TRANS MANAGEMENT"	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2025	KM Ship Management SIA	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2024	LLC " MARINE TRANS MANAGEMENT"	28.77	19.25	+49%	875 of 1,111	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	23.99	20.67	+16%	657 of 1,045	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	23.22	21.57	+8%	573 of 1,034	EMICERT	A
2021	not published	14.97	22.70	−34%	220 of 1,142	EMICERT	A
2020	not published	26.10	24.50	+7%	654 of 1,167	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	29.81	24.96	+19%	729 of 1,154	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	34.79	24.89	+40%	762 of 1,044	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.