Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MERRY M

IMO: 9450650
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 23,254 t
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.13 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FOUR NABUCCO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Premuda S.p.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,254 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

91.6

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.39

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+57%)

Average speed

8.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

616 t

CO₂ emitted

1,938 t

1,968 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,726 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

776 h

32 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+11%)

61.0Ranks 2,469 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 8.7 kn · median 10.7 (−19%)

8.8Faster than 9% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+57%)

4.80Ranks 2,996 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU27%
Into the EU70%
At berth in the EU4%

47% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (915 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

69 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+30 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MERRY M
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MERRY M
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MERRY M
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	+28%	+15%	−65%	+49%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.4 kn	−5%	−24%	+22%	+11%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−18%	−22%	+68%	−67%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+11%	+7%	−60%	+106%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+5%	+14%	+52%	+12%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−54%	−52%	+21%	−71%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 54%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Premuda S.p.A.	50	158	501	192	2.6	100.8	–	–
2025	MERRY ENTERPRISES DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LTD STI	616	1,938	6,726	776	8.7	91.6	12.39	–
2024	Premuda S.p.A.	1,360	4,289	19,042	1,978	9.6	71.4	8.34	–
2023	not published	1,181	3,680	15,654	1,306	12.0	75.5	7.52	91%
2022	not published	861	2,696	9,306	741	12.6	92.5	22.96	46%
2021	not published	1,940	6,092	23,344	1,790	13.0	83.1	11.17	84%
2020	not published	1,211	3,813	15,377	1,277	12.0	78.8	9.97	–
2019	not published	2,194	13,706	12,747	1,114	11.4	172.1	34.59	97%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Premuda S.p.A.	–	–	–	–	RINA	B
2025	MERRY ENTERPRISES DENIZCILIK SANAYI VE TICARET LTD STI	12.39	7.89	+57%	2,996 of 3,610	Verifavia	A
2024	Premuda S.p.A.	8.34	8.09	+3%	1,634 of 3,089	RINA	–
2023	not published	7.52	8.27	−9%	1,451 of 3,548	ABS	B
2022	not published	22.96	8.71	+164%	3,797 of 3,968	ABS	B
2021	not published	11.17	8.57	+30%	2,579 of 3,466	ABS	B
2020	not published	9.97	8.24	+21%	2,158 of 3,150	ABS	B
2019	not published	34.59	8.38	+313%	3,320 of 3,360	ABS	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.