Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LAPIS LAZULI

IMO: 9450662
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,303 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FOUR OTELLO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Load Line Marine S A

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,303 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

176.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

436

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

5.4 kn

Fuel per day at sea

22.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

59 t

CO₂ emitted

191 t

194 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

336 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

62 h

3 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 100.6 kg/nm · median 84.6 (+19%)

61.8Ranks 2,409 of 3,089, lowest first119.4

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 10.6 (−25%)

8.8Faster than 5% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+66%)

4.85Ranks 2,638 of 3,089, lowest first15.76

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU67%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU21%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (127 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

41 t

21.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+3 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LAPIS LAZULI
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LAPIS LAZULI
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LAPIS LAZULI
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	+76%	+18%	−98%	–	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 76%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.8 kn	+16%	−14%	+7%	+16%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	+13%	+0%	+27%	−2%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−8%	−5%	−44%	+5%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+3%	+11%	+139%	+24%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.1 kn	−5%	−20%	−55%	−54%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Load Line Marine S A	59	191	336	62	5.4	176.9	435.54	–
2024part-year	Premuda S.p.A.	1,368	4,312	13,992	1,657	8.4	97.8	13.41	–
2024	Load Line Marine S A	1,714	5,401	17,031	2,136	8.0	100.6	13.41	–
2023	not published	1,374	4,321	15,881	1,473	10.8	86.5	11.53	79%
2022	not published	957	2,983	12,544	1,027	12.2	76.3	11.82	70%
2021	not published	1,856	5,817	22,423	1,898	11.8	82.8	11.26	72%
2020	not published	751	2,355	9,366	850	11.0	80.2	9.10	–
2019	not published	1,772	11,409	21,024	1,609	13.1	84.3	19.99	94%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Load Line Marine S A	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	A
2024part-year	Premuda S.p.A.	–	–	–	–	RINA	–
2024	Load Line Marine S A	13.41	8.09	+66%	2,638 of 3,089	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	11.53	8.27	+39%	2,686 of 3,548	ABS	B
2022	not published	11.82	8.71	+36%	2,968 of 3,968	ABS	B
2021	not published	11.26	8.57	+31%	2,610 of 3,466	ABS	B
2020	not published	9.10	8.24	+10%	1,906 of 3,150	ABS	B
2019	not published	19.99	8.38	+139%	3,195 of 3,360	ABS	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.