Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ALICIA G

IMO: 9459955
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 14,455 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.55 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: LADY DORIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FCN MANAGEMENT INC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,455 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

72.4

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.86

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+101%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,660 t

CO₂ emitted

5,255 t

5,337 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,924 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,149 h

90 days, 25% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.4 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−12%)

61.0Ranks 1,043 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.7 (+0%)

8.8Faster than 49% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.86 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+101%)

4.80Ranks 3,245 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU39%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU4%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,855 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

189 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+82 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALICIA G
Bulk carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

ALICIA G
Bulk carrier median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALICIA G
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−1.0 kn	+3%	−6%	+10%	+56%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−2%	+4%	−61%	+0%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−1%	−10%	+12%	−20%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−10%	−3%	+83%	+18%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+9%	+9%	−40%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.6 kn	−9%	+19%	−5%	−7%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FCN MANAGEMENT INC	1,660	5,255	22,924	2,149	10.7	72.4	15.86	–
2023	not published	1,468	4,609	20,880	1,789	11.7	70.3	10.14	–
2022	not published	3,855	12,093	53,796	4,904	11.0	71.7	10.09	–
2021	not published	3,467	10,862	48,051	3,973	12.1	72.2	12.57	–
2020	not published	2,111	6,629	26,256	2,360	11.1	80.4	10.64	–
2019	not published	3,240	10,145	44,077	3,948	11.2	73.5	11.23	–
2018	not published	3,744	11,759	46,313	5,403	8.6	80.8	12.10	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FCN MANAGEMENT INC	15.86	7.89	+101%	3,245 of 3,610	DNV	A
2023	not published	10.14	8.27	+23%	2,398 of 3,548	DNV	A
2022	not published	10.09	8.71	+16%	2,512 of 3,968	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	12.57	8.57	+47%	2,846 of 3,466	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	10.64	8.24	+29%	2,300 of 3,150	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	11.23	8.38	+34%	2,537 of 3,360	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	12.10	8.50	+42%	2,690 of 3,384	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.