Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NOELLE G

IMO: 9459967
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 17,498 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.54 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC
Former names: YULIA, MV YULIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FCN MANAGEMENT INC.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,498 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

82.5

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.85

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+88%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,967 t

CO₂ emitted

6,195 t

6,292 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,842 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,301 h

96 days, 26% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 82.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−0%)

61.0Ranks 1,798 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.4 kn · median 10.7 (−3%)

8.8Faster than 38% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.85 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+88%)

4.80Ranks 3,180 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU50%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU7%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,814 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

411 t

6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+97 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NOELLE G
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NOELLE G
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NOELLE G
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+22%	+23%	−24%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	−12%	−19%	+21%	+32%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	−17%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+0%	−2%	−36%	−24%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	−3%	−4%	+36%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+9%	+11%	−34%	−12%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−5%	−0%	+85%	+27%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	1,967	6,195	23,842	2,301	10.4	82.5	14.85	–
2024	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	2,107	6,623	31,284	3,041	10.3	67.4	15.14	–
2023	not published	1,977	6,209	25,805	2,307	11.2	76.6	11.49	–
2022	not published	2,467	7,814	31,249	2,818	11.1	79.0	10.73	–
2021	not published	3,858	12,108	48,949	4,302	11.4	78.8	14.07	73%
2020	not published	2,933	9,218	36,041	3,144	11.5	81.4	11.22	–
2019	not published	4,043	12,697	54,337	4,836	11.2	74.4	12.75	–
2018	not published	2,303	7,204	29,313	2,736	10.7	78.6	10.04	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	14.85	7.89	+88%	3,180 of 3,610	DNV	A
2024	FCN MANAGEMENT INC.	15.14	8.09	+87%	2,752 of 3,089	DNV	A
2023	not published	11.49	8.27	+39%	2,679 of 3,548	DNV	–
2022	not published	10.73	8.71	+23%	2,694 of 3,968	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	14.07	8.57	+64%	3,012 of 3,466	ABS	B
2020	not published	11.22	8.24	+36%	2,438 of 3,150	ABS	B
2019	not published	12.75	8.38	+52%	2,775 of 3,360	ABS	B
2018	not published	10.04	8.50	+18%	2,237 of 3,384	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.