Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SJ COLOMBO

IMO: 9478511
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 35,080 t
Port of registry: Zezu
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.18 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: IMPERIAL EAGLE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DORIKO Limited

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,080 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

79.9

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.13

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (−10%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,375 t

CO₂ emitted

4,303 t

4,371 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,205 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,483 h

62 days, 17% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 79.9 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−3%)

61.0Ranks 1,610 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 10.7 (+8%)

8.8Faster than 86% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.13 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (−10%)

4.80Ranks 1,437 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU15%
Into the EU79%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,273 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SJ COLOMBO
Bulk carrier median

75.080.085.090.095.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

SJ COLOMBO
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SJ COLOMBO
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−0.6 kn	−4%	−9%	+237%	−32%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−12%	−8%	−85%	+47%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−4%	−9%	+111%	+4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+6%	+16%	+2,306%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+4%	+2%	−92%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	–	–	–	–	–

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DORIKO Limited	1,375	4,303	17,205	1,483	11.6	79.9	7.13	–
2023	not published	425	1,329	5,105	420	12.2	83.2	10.56	–
2022	not published	3,121	9,735	33,046	2,822	11.7	94.4	7.19	–
2021	not published	1,548	4,837	15,689	1,275	12.3	98.7	6.93	–
2020	not published	61	190	652	58	11.2	93.2	255.43	–
2019	not published	701	2,198	7,799	684	11.4	89.9	11.60	–
2018	not published	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DORIKO Limited	7.13	7.89	−10%	1,437 of 3,610	Korean Register	A
2023	not published	10.56	8.27	+28%	2,494 of 3,548	DNV	C
2022	not published	7.19	8.71	−17%	1,246 of 3,968	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.93	8.57	−19%	960 of 3,466	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	11.60	8.38	+38%	2,614 of 3,360	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.