Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

DARIKA

IMO
9506693
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
21,543 t
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.91 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
GOLD POINT, PS AUGUSTA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Finav One Limited

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,543 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
118.7
Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−8%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
17.32
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+118%)
Average speed
10.9 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+2%)
Fuel per day at sea
31.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,200 t
CO₂ emitted
3,773 t
3,832 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
10,111 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
924 h
39 days, 11% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 118.7 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−8%)
76.1Ranks 656 of 1,665, lowest first190.8
Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.7 (+2%)
8.0Faster than 56% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+118%)
4.51Ranks 1,344 of 1,665, lowest first27.66
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports2%
  • From the EU69%
  • Into the EU22%
  • At berth in the EU8%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
285 t
7.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+59 t
+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • DARIKA
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • DARIKA
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • DARIKA
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.7 kn−7%−12%−10%+19%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2024+0.3 kn+26%+29%−7%+55%Same speed, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2022+3.3 kn−30%−0%−59%−43%3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.3 kn+20%+3%−35%+35%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearFinav One Limited1,2003,77310,11192410.9118.717.32–
2025Navadel Ship Management - FZE1,2003,77310,11192410.9118.717.32–
2024Finav One Limited1,4344,54111,20196911.6128.014.54–
2022not published1,2233,83712,0831,06811.3101.29.3681%
2019not published4,25113,35729,3353,6908.0144.916.52–
2018not published5,47017,13445,3294,8779.3120.712.2182%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearFinav One Limited––––RINAB
2025Navadel Ship Management - FZE17.327.95+118%1,344 of 1,665DNVA+C
2024Finav One Limited14.5416.73−13%539 of 1,274RINA–
2022not published9.3616.06−42%168 of 1,409ABSB
2019not published16.5217.32−5%609 of 1,321RINAB
2018not published12.2117.14−29%342 of 1,294RINAB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.