Navalyze · Container · Ship

AS SELINA

IMO: 9516789
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,573 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.45 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Wilhelmsen Ahrenkiel Ship Management GmbH & Co. KG · part of Wilhelmsen Ahrenkiel

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,573 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

120.5

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (−28%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

39.12

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (+123%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (−18%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

765 t

CO₂ emitted

2,378 t

2,415 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,349 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

572 h

24 days, 7% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 120.5 kg/nm · median 167.2 (−28%)

78.9Ranks 679 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 13.5 (−18%)

9.6Faster than 20% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 39.12 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (+123%)

7.33Ranks 1,613 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU53%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU1%

48% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,152 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

17 t

0.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+37 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AS SELINA
Container median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

AS SELINA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AS SELINA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	+9%	+29%	−58%	−49%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−16%	−29%	+69%	+54%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+25%	+22%	−3%	+47%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	−73%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.0 kn	−9%	+22%	−9%	−30%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	+5%	+49%	+36%	−8%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Wilhelmsen Ahrenkiel Ship Management GmbH & Co. KG	765	2,378	6,349	572	11.1	120.5	39.12	–
2023	not published	1,655	5,170	14,945	1,595	9.4	110.8	76.36	–
2022	not published	1,169	3,647	8,835	794	11.1	132.3	49.57	–
2021	not published	959	3,016	9,094	798	11.4	105.5	33.74	–
2020	not published	3,438	10,810	33,253	2,871	11.6	103.4	41.23	–
2019	not published	4,155	13,053	36,420	4,238	8.6	114.1	58.50	–
2018	not published	2,919	9,120	26,860	4,421	6.1	108.7	63.72	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Wilhelmsen Ahrenkiel Ship Management GmbH & Co. KG	39.12	17.52	+123%	1,613 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	76.36	19.40	+294%	1,872 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	49.57	19.13	+159%	1,604 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	33.74	17.90	+88%	1,380 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	41.23	17.58	+135%	1,492 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	58.50	18.88	+210%	1,641 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	63.72	20.22	+215%	1,599 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.