Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

ADELINE

IMO: 9539092
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 881 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.97 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHIPLUX II S.A. · part of Shiplux

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 881 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

70.6 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (−33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

253

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+166%)

Average speed

12.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,527 t

CO₂ emitted

11,131 t

11,304 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

49,969 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,907 h

163 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.6 kg/nm · median 104.6 (−33%)

56.6Ranks 36 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 14.4 (−11%)

10.9Faster than 27% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 252.93 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+166%)

47.35Ranks 200 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU46%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU6%

2% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (172 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ADELINE
Ro-ro median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ADELINE
Ro-ro median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ADELINE
Ro-ro median

0.0100200300400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−3%	−2%	+2%	−13%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+3%	+8%	+4%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−1%	−5%	+6%	−17%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−3%	−1%	+3%	+28%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−12%	−11%	+13%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.5 kn	+2%	−10%	−45%	+169%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.3 kn	−1%	+31%	+54%	+29%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SHIPLUX II S.A.	3,441	10,859	48,967	3,830	12.8	70.3	252.25	–
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	3,527	11,131	49,969	3,907	12.8	70.6	252.93	–
2024	SHIPLUX II S.A.	3,574	11,278	48,974	3,863	12.7	73.0	290.48	–
2023	not published	3,325	10,493	47,101	3,876	12.2	70.6	297.51	–
2022	not published	3,178	10,027	44,597	3,526	12.6	71.3	358.16	–
2021	not published	3,188	10,060	43,405	3,517	12.3	73.5	279.42	–
2020	not published	3,207	10,131	38,320	3,125	12.3	83.7	345.15	–
2019	not published	5,678	17,884	69,446	5,014	13.8	81.8	128.44	–
2018	not published	3,710	11,714	45,101	4,302	10.5	82.3	99.84	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SHIPLUX II S.A.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	252.93	95.19	+166%	200 of 235	DNV	A+C
2024	SHIPLUX II S.A.	290.48	97.53	+198%	196 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	297.51	108.62	+174%	191 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	358.16	90.62	+295%	209 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	279.42	103.64	+170%	198 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	345.15	102.77	+236%	217 of 238	DNV	C
2019	not published	128.44	90.89	+41%	182 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	99.84	91.03	+10%	149 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.