Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NEW LAUREL

IMO: 9603192
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 29,302 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Associated Maritime Company (Hong Kong) Limited

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,302 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

166.6 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 129.0 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.79

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.06 (+121%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

972 t

CO₂ emitted

3,040 t

3,087 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,831 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

470 h

20 days, 5% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 166.6 kg/nm · median 129.0 (+29%)

79.5Ranks 1,430 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 10.9 (+14%)

8.1Faster than 92% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.79 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+121%)

4.44Ranks 1,490 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU68%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU6%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,611 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NEW LAUREL
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’242024

Average speed, kn

NEW LAUREL
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’192019’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NEW LAUREL
Oil tanker median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’192019’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2024	+2.9 kn	−39%	−20%	−71%	+479%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Associated Maritime Company (Hong Kong) Limited	972	3,040	5,831	470	12.4	166.6	17.79	–
2019	not published	5,423	17,105	19,953	2,098	9.5	271.8	3.07	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Associated Maritime Company (Hong Kong) Limited	17.79	8.06	+121%	1,490 of 1,787	DNV	C
2019	not published	3.07	8.83	−65%	84 of 1,919	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.