Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

TAN BINH 357

IMO: 9606534
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 21,146 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.68 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CLEARWATER BAY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Tianjin Hangan International Shipmanagement Co., Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,146 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

56.9

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−31%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.55

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+8%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

517 t

CO₂ emitted

1,644 t

1,670 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,094 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

797 h

33 days, 9% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 56.9 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−31%)

61.0Ranks 213 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 10.7 (+7%)

8.8Faster than 81% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.55 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+8%)

4.80Ranks 2,108 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU46%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU2%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

164 t

32% of all fuel; 68% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

33 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+26 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TAN BINH 357
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

TAN BINH 357
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TAN BINH 357
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+0.5 kn	−8%	−4%	−40%	−16%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2023	−0.6 kn	−8%	−13%	−37%	+6%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−21%	−9%	+1,311%	−37%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Tianjin Hangan International Shipmanagement Co., Ltd.	345	1,099	6,198	557	11.1	55.6	9.71	–
2025part-year	Wealth Ocean Ship Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.	172	545	2,896	240	12.1	59.4	6.89	95%
2025	Tan Binh Co Ltd	517	1,644	9,094	797	11.4	56.9	8.55	32%
2023	not published	935	2,963	15,106	1,381	10.9	61.9	10.16	78%
2019	not published	1,616	5,053	24,024	2,090	11.5	67.2	9.54	84%
2018	not published	144	451	1,703	169	10.1	84.6	15.09	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Tianjin Hangan International Shipmanagement Co., Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2025part-year	Wealth Ocean Ship Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2025	Tan Binh Co Ltd	8.55	7.89	+8%	2,108 of 3,610	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	10.16	8.27	+23%	2,406 of 3,548	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	9.54	8.38	+14%	2,113 of 3,360	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	15.09	8.50	+78%	2,998 of 3,384	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.