Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARAN GAS DELPHI

IMO
9633173
Type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
Piraeus
Technical efficiency
EIV 6.16 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MARAN GAS MARITIME INC. · part of Maran

?
?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
187.7 kg/nm
LNG carrier median 204.5 kg/nm (−8%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
5.10
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.39 (−31%)
Average speed
13.7 kn
LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−6%)
Fuel per day at sea
61.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,346 t
CO₂ emitted
9,122 t
11,466 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
17,828 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,302 h
54 days, 15% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 187.7 kg/nm · median 204.5 (−8%)
147.8Ranks 121 of 312, lowest first328.0
Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 14.6 (−6%)
11.0Faster than 34% of LNG carrier ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.10 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (−31%)
4.54Ranks 56 of 312, lowest first17.34
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU34%
  • Into the EU65%
  • At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,607 t).

Fuel burned laden
99%
1% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
80.1 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.257
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MARAN GAS DELPHI
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • MARAN GAS DELPHI
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • MARAN GAS DELPHI
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2024+3.9 kn−22%+10%−32%−42%3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.6 kn−10%−23%−46%−0%1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+2.4 kn−1%+25%+457%−27%2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−2.5 kn−4%−25%−61%+29%2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−3.2 kn+22%−5%−21%−34%3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.3,3469,12217,8281,30213.7187.7–99%
2023LNGnot published6,26917,50426,1352,6719.8239.9––
2022LNGnot published12,95336,28248,6354,27411.4266.3––
2021LNGnot published2,3506,6648,7369679.0269.0––
2020LNGnot published6,24117,20322,1601,93511.5281.6––
2019LNGnot published6,50017,91128,1441,90914.7231.0––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024LNGMARAN GAS MARITIME INC.5.107.39−31%56 of 312ABSA
2023LNGnot published8.849.10−3%170 of 355ABSA
2022LNGnot published8.8610.38−15%155 of 379ABSA
2021LNGnot published12.2010.46+17%183 of 289ABSA
2020LNGnot published9.4910.71−11%99 of 267ABSA
2019LNGnot published14.3810.87+32%187 of 248ABSA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.