Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

VANTAGE ROSE

IMO
9646716
Type
Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried
290 t
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.15 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
AMORGOS, AMORGOS BOLTEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Vantage Shipping Lines SA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 290 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
70.3
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
758
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
9.3 kn
Fuel per day at sea
15.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
69 t
CO₂ emitted
215 t
218 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
976 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
104 h
4 days, 1% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 70.6 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−17%)
61.8Ranks 720 of 3,089, lowest first119.4
Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 10.6 (+1%)
8.8Faster than 53% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.03 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+148%)
4.85Ranks 2,928 of 3,089, lowest first15.76
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU79%
  • Into the EU8%
  • At berth in the EU13%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (122 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
29 t
13.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
+3 t
+1.4% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • VANTAGE ROSE
  • Bulk carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • VANTAGE ROSE
  • Bulk carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VANTAGE ROSE
  • Bulk carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.4 kn−0%−14%−96%–1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.2 kn−19%−20%−48%+71%Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.1 kn+8%+7%+6%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.3 kn−3%+0%+55%+16%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+1.6 kn−7%+8%+148%+2%1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−3.3 kn+82%+34%−62%+92%3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 82%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.1 kn−31%−30%+1,075%−72%Same speed, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Vantage Shipping Lines SA692159761049.370.3758.49–
2024part-yearBolten III GmbH & Co.KG8442,64610,6071,1269.479.613.83–
2024Vantage Shipping Lines SA1,6815,25523,7942,22010.770.620.03–
2023not published3,99612,54546,0384,22110.986.811.68–
2022not published3,47810,93843,4083,92911.080.111.81–
2021not published2,3107,26428,0032,62310.782.510.20–
2020not published1,0063,15311,3031,2419.189.010.01–
2019not published1,4544,55329,8122,40412.448.85.21–
2018not published1805602,53820712.370.718.88–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Vantage Shipping Lines SA––––ICS Verification ServicesA
2024part-yearBolten III GmbH & Co.KG––––DNVB
2024Vantage Shipping Lines SA20.038.09+148%2,928 of 3,089ICS Verification ServicesA
2023not published11.688.27+41%2,711 of 3,548DNVB
2022not published11.818.71+36%2,964 of 3,968DNVB
2021not published10.208.57+19%2,333 of 3,466DNVB
2020not published10.018.24+21%2,167 of 3,150DNVB
2019not published5.218.38−38%410 of 3,360DNVB
2018not published18.888.50+122%3,164 of 3,384VerifaviaA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.