TIAN SHOU

IMO: 9704752
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 5.56 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS (SOUTHEAST ASIA) PTE. LTD. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

90.2 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+156%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

67.92

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+167%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

663 t

CO₂ emitted

2,093 t

2,125 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,348 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

801 h

33 days, 9% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 90.2 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+156%)

17.4Ranks 2,587 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.2 kn · median 9.3 (−1%)

7.0Faster than 46% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 67.92 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+167%)

10.14Ranks 2,538 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU37%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU13%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,199 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

13.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

TIAN SHOU
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIAN SHOU
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

TIAN SHOU
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−3.1 kn	+28%	−4%	−69%	+1,069%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−13%	−10%	+58%	−13%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−1%	−5%	−24%	−1%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+1%	−1%	−58%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+0%	+6%	+58%	+0%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	−5%	+7%	+37%	−5%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS (SOUTHEAST ASIA) PTE. LTD.	663	2,093	7,348	801	9.2	90.2	–	–
2024part-year	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS (SOUTHEAST ASIA) PTE. LTD.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS (SOUTHEAST ASIA) PTE. LTD.	1,676	5,266	23,770	1,930	12.3	70.5	–	–
2023	not published	1,225	3,834	15,054	1,271	11.8	81.4	9.75	–
2022	not published	1,624	5,101	19,736	1,596	12.4	82.3	8.54	–
2021	not published	3,835	11,961	47,218	3,746	12.6	81.2	13.92	–
2020	not published	2,432	7,581	29,949	2,519	11.9	81.2	9.54	–
2019	not published	1,878	5,856	21,925	2,084	10.5	85.7	10.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS (SOUTHEAST ASIA) PTE. LTD.	67.92	25.45	+167%	2,538 of 2,706	China Classification Society	A
2024part-year	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS (SOUTHEAST ASIA) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	China Classification Society	A
2024	COSCO SHIPPING SPECIALIZED CARRIERS (SOUTHEAST ASIA) PTE. LTD.	5.81	19.25	−70%	38 of 1,111	China Classification Society	A
2023	not published	6.68	20.67	−68%	56 of 1,045	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	6.78	21.57	−69%	47 of 1,034	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	6.64	22.70	−71%	24 of 1,142	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	6.64	24.50	−73%	18 of 1,167	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	7.00	24.96	−72%	16 of 1,154	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.