Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

GLOVIS COSMOS

IMO: 9707027
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,900 t
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: G-Marine Service Co Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,900 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

93.9 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.40

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−23%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

690 t

CO₂ emitted

2,151 t

2,185 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,354 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

544 h

23 days, 6% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 93.9 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−6%)

79.6Ranks 160 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)

12.0Faster than 30% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.40 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−23%)

34.70Ranks 128 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU0%
Into the EU85%
At berth in the EU2%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,217 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GLOVIS COSMOS
Vehicle carrier median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GLOVIS COSMOS
Vehicle carrier median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GLOVIS COSMOS
Vehicle carrier median

40.050.060.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−32%	−38%	−12%	−29%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+13%	+23%	−47%	–	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	+10%	−8%	−32%	–	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	−1%	+11%	+40%	−9%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+5%	−2%	−38%	+8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−6%	+2%	−56%	−10%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	+9%	+2%	+246%	−34%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	690	2,151	7,354	544	13.5	93.9	42.40	–
2024	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	1,167	3,648	8,391	575	14.6	139.1	59.79	–
2023	not published	1,940	6,077	15,747	1,177	13.4	123.2	–	–
2022	not published	2,596	8,123	23,111	1,450	15.9	112.3	47.62	–
2021	not published	1,870	5,848	16,549	1,158	14.3	113.0	52.47	–
2020	not published	2,878	9,060	26,659	1,747	15.3	107.9	48.62	–
2019	not published	7,019	21,968	61,209	4,360	14.0	114.7	54.21	–
2018	not published	1,868	5,858	17,674	1,187	14.9	105.7	82.14	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	42.40	55.36	−23%	128 of 506	Korean Register	C
2024	G-Marine Service Co Ltd	59.79	55.31	+8%	189 of 335	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	47.62	57.66	−17%	124 of 463	Korean Register	C
2021	not published	52.47	59.57	−12%	161 of 459	Korean Register	C
2020	not published	48.62	57.26	−15%	135 of 449	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	54.21	58.95	−8%	168 of 426	Korean Register	C
2018	not published	82.14	62.35	+32%	318 of 434	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.