Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

PROPEL WEALTH

IMO: 9736353
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 33,757 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 3.23 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ELSA S

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 33,757 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.2

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.07

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+15%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,130 t

CO₂ emitted

3,525 t

3,580 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

11,512 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

893 h

37 days, 10% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 98.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+19%)

61.0Ranks 2,841 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 10.7 (+21%)

8.8Faster than 99% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.07 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+15%)

4.80Ranks 2,300 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU37%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,803 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

80 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+55 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PROPEL WEALTH
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

PROPEL WEALTH
Bulk carrier median

10.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PROPEL WEALTH
Bulk carrier median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+0.7 kn	+15%	+21%	−13%	−29%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.9 kn	−20%	−14%	+17%	+197%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+6%	+1%	−18%	−38%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	+10%	+26%	−67%	+44%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	+4%	−10%	+291%	−42%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2025	Su-Nav International Pvt Ltd	1,130	3,525	11,512	893	12.9	98.2	9.07	–
2023	not published	1,129	3,528	13,196	1,078	12.2	85.6	12.79	–
2022	not published	1,214	3,796	11,285	995	11.3	107.6	4.31	–
2021	not published	1,400	4,380	13,820	1,154	12.0	101.3	6.97	–
2020	not published	3,887	12,159	42,178	4,033	10.5	92.2	4.84	–
2019	not published	960	3,006	10,793	894	12.1	88.9	8.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Su-Nav SMEA Private Ltd	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2025	Su-Nav International Pvt Ltd	9.07	7.89	+15%	2,300 of 3,610	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	12.79	8.27	+55%	2,863 of 3,548	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	4.31	8.71	−51%	222 of 3,968	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	6.97	8.57	−19%	977 of 3,466	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	4.84	8.24	−41%	233 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	8.34	8.38	−0%	1,663 of 3,360	ClassNK	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.