Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

HOEGH GALLEON

IMO: 9820013
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.79 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Hoegh LNG Fleet Management AS

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

288.8

LNG carrier median 204.5 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

57.18

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.39 (+674%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.6 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,174 t

CO₂ emitted

15,667 t

16,912 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,914 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,318 h

55 days, 15% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 288.8 kg/nm · median 204.5 (+41%)

147.8Ranks 244 of 312, lowest first328.0

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 14.6 (−7%)

11.0Faster than 33% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 57.18 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+674%)

4.54Ranks 307 of 312, lowest first17.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU10%
Into the EU83%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,370 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

360 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

36.9 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+1,245 t

+7.9% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HOEGH GALLEON
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

HOEGH GALLEON
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

HOEGH GALLEON
LNG carrier median

0.020.040.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−4%	−12%	−47%	+468%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.5 kn	+3%	+24%	+16%	+17%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+9%	−4%	−43%	−11%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+14%	+13%	+66%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−15%	−19%	+471%	+168%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Hoegh LNG Fleet Management AS	5,174	15,667	17,914	1,318	13.6	288.8	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10,285	28,375	34,080	2,297	14.8	301.8	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8,615	24,332	29,464	2,392	12.3	292.4	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,939	38,706	52,007	3,706	14.0	268.0	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7,321	20,233	31,261	2,205	14.2	234.2	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	1,514	4,169	5,470	368	14.9	276.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Hoegh LNG Fleet Management AS	57.18	7.39	+674%	307 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10.06	9.10	+11%	203 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8.62	10.38	−17%	146 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9.64	10.46	−8%	131 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12.94	10.71	+21%	187 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4.83	10.87	−56%	7 of 248	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.