Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MARVEL DOVE

IMO
9964182
Type
LNG carrier
Technical efficiency
EEDI 4.36 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SK shipping Co Ltd

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
152.2 kg/nm
LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (−20%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
5.33
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (−25%)
Average speed
14.3 kn
LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−1%)
Fuel per day at sea
52.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,385 t
CO₂ emitted
14,680 t
17,723 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
35,372 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,467 h
103 days, 28% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 152.2 kg/nm · median 190.4 (−20%)
152.1Ranks 40 of 386, lowest first319.4
Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 14.4 (−1%)
11.2Faster than 48% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.33 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−25%)
5.06Ranks 70 of 386, lowest first16.14
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU50%
  • Into the EU48%
  • At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,486 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
103.0 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.207
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MARVEL DOVE
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • MARVEL DOVE
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • MARVEL DOVE
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.4 kn−2%+2%+28%+12%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025LNGSK shipping Co Ltd5,38514,68035,3722,46714.3152.2––
2024LNGSK shipping Co Ltd4,28711,86227,6781,99613.9154.9––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGSK shipping Co Ltd5.337.12−25%70 of 386Korean RegisterA+C
2024LNGSK shipping Co Ltd4.747.39−36%38 of 312Korean RegisterA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.