Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

TYCHO BRAHE

IMO: 9007116
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: HelsingÖR
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Oresundslinjen Helsingor ApS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

25.1

Ro-pax median 150 kg/nm (−83%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

271

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (−52%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

37.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−85%)

Average speed

8.4 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−47%)

Fuel per day at sea

5.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,056 t

CO₂ emitted

3,386 t

3,438 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

42,112 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,989 h

208 days, 57% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 25.1 kg/nm · median 150 (−83%)

69.3Ranks 6 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 8.4 kn · median 15.8 (−47%)

12.0Faster than 2% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 271 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−52%)

66.8Ranks 137 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 37.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−85%)

48.6Ranks 24 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports70%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU30%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,386 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,025 t

30.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+52 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TYCHO BRAHE
Ro-pax median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TYCHO BRAHE
Ro-pax median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

TYCHO BRAHE
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

TYCHO BRAHE
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	+27%	+34%	−3%	−21%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−67%	−67%	+7%	−71%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 67%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−25%	−25%	+1%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	+6%	−40%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	−13%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	+79%	+71%	+3%	+195%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 79%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−39%	−39%	−0%	−38%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 39%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Oresundslinjen Helsingor ApS	1,056	3,386	42,112	4,989	8.4	25.1	–	–
2024	Oresundslinjen Helsingor ApS	859	2,753	43,594	5,443	8.0	19.7	–	–
2023	not published	2,416	7,746	40,649	5,075	8.0	59.4	–	–
2022	not published	3,199	10,257	40,395	5,043	8.0	79.2	–	–
2021	not published	3,143	10,077	37,988	4,743	8.0	82.7	–	–
2020	not published	3,520	11,284	43,893	5,480	8.0	80.2	–	–
2019	not published	1,900	6,091	42,511	5,042	8.4	44.7	–	–
2018	not published	3,123	10,013	42,703	5,065	8.4	73.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Oresundslinjen Helsingor ApS	271	567	−52%	137 of 408	37.8	253	−85%	Verifavia	A
2024	Oresundslinjen Helsingor ApS	341	547	−38%	153 of 404	40.8	233	−82%	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	1,195	680	+76%	313 of 386	131	234	−44%	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	1,609	626	+157%	355 of 394	161	253	−36%	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	2,677	815	+228%	351 of 377	160	226	−29%	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	2,698	751	+259%	354 of 387	256	217	+17%	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	915	569	+61%	267 of 394	99.2	223	−55%	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	1,475	729	+102%	268 of 361	155	184	−16%	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.