Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

QAMUTIK

IMO: 9081289
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.24 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

52.5

General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.9

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.3 (+60%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,348 t

CO₂ emitted

4,243 t

4,309 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,690 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,141 h

89 days, 24% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 52.5 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−11%)

34.9Ranks 464 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 10.5 (+14%)

7.8Faster than 84% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 30.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.3 (+60%)

7.51Ranks 919 of 1,111, lowest first39.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU58%
Into the EU26%
At berth in the EU2%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,448 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

93 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+66 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

QAMUTIK
General cargo median

50.055.060.065.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

QAMUTIK
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

QAMUTIK
General cargo median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	−7%	+6%	+38%	+6%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	+0%	−16%	−21%	−5%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−6%	+2%	+52%	+23%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+9%	+8%	−40%	+34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.5 kn	−14%	+23%	+39%	−27%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.4 kn	+0%	−29%	−16%	−0%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	1,244	3,889	20,738	1,753	11.8	60.0	–	–
2024	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	1,348	4,243	25,690	2,141	12.0	52.5	–	–
2023	not published	1,044	3,274	18,563	1,765	10.5	56.2	–	–
2022	not published	1,307	4,119	23,360	1,846	12.7	56.0	–	–
2021	not published	921	2,902	15,382	1,331	11.6	59.8	–	–
2020	not published	1,417	4,448	25,689	2,206	11.6	55.1	–	–
2019	not published	1,186	3,740	18,520	2,279	8.1	64.0	36.3	–
2018	not published	1,402	4,408	21,983	1,912	11.5	63.8	31.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	30.9	19.3	+60%	919 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	29.1	20.7	+41%	808 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	30.7	21.6	+42%	779 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	25.0	22.7	+10%	687 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	18.7	24.5	−24%	302 of 1,167	Verifavia	A+B
2019	not published	25.7	25.0	+3%	601 of 1,154	Verifavia	A+B
2018	not published	25.7	24.9	+3%	551 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.