Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

MITIQ

IMO: 9081306
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Amsterdam
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.24 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

48.9

General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

15.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.3 (−22%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

347 t

CO₂ emitted

1,084 t

1,101 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

7,088 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

579 h

24 days, 7% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 48.9 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−17%)

34.9Ranks 407 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 10.5 (+16%)

7.8Faster than 87% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 15.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.3 (−22%)

7.51Ranks 407 of 1,111, lowest first39.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU80%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU2%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (619 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

26 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+17 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MITIQ
General cargo median

40.050.060.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MITIQ
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

MITIQ
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−0%	+2%	−68%	−40%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−8%	−19%	+37%	−37%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	+6%	+13%	−40%	+44%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.4 kn	−33%	−17%	−19%	−1%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+27%	+29%	+10%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−31%	−37%	+21%	−50%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	412	1,297	7,076	615	11.5	58.2	–	–
2024	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	347	1,084	7,088	579	12.2	48.9	–	–
2023	not published	1,087	3,422	22,142	1,849	12.0	49.1	–	–
2022	not published	863	2,703	16,206	1,192	13.6	53.2	–	–
2021	not published	1,362	4,278	27,010	2,124	12.7	50.4	–	–
2020	not published	2,510	7,930	33,329	3,243	10.3	75.3	–	–
2019	not published	1,801	5,660	30,324	2,999	10.1	59.4	32.3	–
2018	not published	2,158	6,758	25,101	2,281	11.0	86.0	74.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Spliethoff Agency & Forwarding B.V.	15.1	19.3	−22%	407 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	25.0	20.7	+21%	688 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	39.9	21.6	+85%	896 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	27.8	22.7	+22%	802 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	28.0	24.5	+14%	740 of 1,167	Verifavia	A+B
2019	not published	24.6	25.0	−1%	563 of 1,154	Verifavia	A+B
2018	not published	49.5	24.9	+99%	912 of 1,044	SGS United Kingdom Ltd	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.