Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ALONDRA

IMO: 9113719
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Egernsund
Technical efficiency: EIV 30.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Corral Line ApS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

37.1

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

275

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+977%)

Average speed

7.3 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (−22%)

Fuel per day at sea

6.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

605 t

CO₂ emitted

1,925 t

1,955 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

16,299 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,227 h

93 days, 25% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 37.1 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+5%)

17.4Ranks 1,443 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 7.3 kn · median 9.3 (−22%)

6.9Faster than 13% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 275 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+977%)

10.2Ranks 2,693 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU49%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (994 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

63 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+30 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ALONDRA
General cargo median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALONDRA
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALONDRA
General cargo median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.2 kn	−2%	−32%	−64%	−9%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	−11%	+14%	+54%	+8%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	+9%	−12%	−60%	+8%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.6 kn	+5%	−9%	+0%	−13%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+3%	+4%	−2%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	−17%	−5%	+37%	−25%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	−1%	+9%	+186%	−25%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Corral Line ApS	605	1,925	16,299	2,227	7.3	37.1	–	–
2024	Corral Line ApS	1,726	5,418	45,629	4,335	10.5	37.8	300	–
2023	not published	1,260	3,984	29,565	3,592	8.2	42.6	278	–
2022	not published	2,865	9,061	73,519	7,250	10.1	39.0	259	–
2021	not published	2,718	8,708	73,173	6,252	11.7	37.1	299	–
2020	not published	2,695	8,640	74,729	6,475	11.5	36.1	276	–
2019	not published	2,352	7,443	54,359	5,396	10.1	43.3	369	–
2018	not published	834	2,642	19,030	2,090	9.1	43.8	495	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Corral Line ApS	275	25.5	+977%	2,693 of 2,723	Verifavia	A
2024	Corral Line ApS	300	51.6	+482%	169 of 189	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	278	93.5	+198%	103 of 116	Verifavia	–
2022	not published	259	74.1	+249%	56 of 78	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	299	159	+87%	53 of 72	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	276	121	+129%	64 of 81	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	369	90.1	+310%	84 of 96	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	495	72.9	+579%	82 of 87	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.