Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

GAZIBEY

IMO: 9121912
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.12 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LAIME, UNICASTLE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: United Marine Muhendislik San.Tic.Ltd. Sti.

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

51.6

General cargo median 58.7 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

20.0

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 19.3 (+4%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

General cargo median 10.5 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,215 t

CO₂ emitted

3,894 t

3,954 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

23,538 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,494 h

104 days, 28% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,111 general cargo ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 51.6 kg/nm · median 58.7 (−12%)

34.9Ranks 452 of 1,111, lowest first87.0

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 10.5 (−10%)

7.8Faster than 25% of general cargo ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 20.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 19.3 (+4%)

7.51Ranks 588 of 1,111, lowest first39.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports33%
From the EU29%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU6%

69% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,706 t).

Fuel burned laden

674 t

56% of all fuel; 44% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

223 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+60 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GAZIBEY
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

GAZIBEY
General cargo median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

GAZIBEY
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−18%	−26%	+110%	+19%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	+17%	+31%	−49%	+7%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−10%	−8%	+89%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−28%	−26%	+499%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.8 kn	+15%	+151%	−91%	−0%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.4 kn	+6%	−43%	−27%	−14%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	United Marine Muhendislik San.Tic.Ltd. Sti.	1,215	3,894	23,538	2,494	9.4	51.6	–	56%
2023	not published	709	2,272	11,198	1,077	10.4	63.3	–	71%
2022	not published	1,198	3,842	22,097	2,369	9.3	54.2	–	–
2021	not published	701	2,246	11,671	1,288	9.1	60.0	–	–
2020	not published	164	525	1,949	220	8.9	83.9	–	–
2019	not published	1,574	4,975	21,502	5,292	4.1	73.2	–	–
2018	not published	2,031	6,458	29,322	3,907	7.5	69.3	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	United Marine Muhendislik San.Tic.Ltd. Sti.	20.0	19.3	+4%	588 of 1,111	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	16.7	20.7	−19%	373 of 1,045	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2022	not published	15.6	21.6	−28%	279 of 1,034	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	14.3	22.7	−37%	191 of 1,142	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	20.4	24.5	−17%	383 of 1,167	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	20.5	25.0	−18%	369 of 1,154	RINA	A
2018	not published	23.7	24.9	−5%	481 of 1,044	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.