Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ICE HAWK

IMO: 9169768
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 5,648 t
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ICE HAWK SHIPPING COMPANY

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,648 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

172

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

97.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+1,123%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,886 t

CO₂ emitted

6,029 t

6,121 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,978 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,062 h

44 days, 12% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 172 kg/nm · median 129 (+34%)

76.1Ranks 1,380 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 10.7 (−4%)

8.0Faster than 39% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 97.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+1,123%)

4.51Ranks 1,663 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports74%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU26%

100% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,029 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,598 t

26.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+92 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ICE HAWK
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ICE HAWK
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ICE HAWK
Oil tanker median

0.025.050.075.0100

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−3%	−7%	+0%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	+1%	+21%	−10%	–	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	+18%	+35%	−13%	+21%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.3 kn	−7%	+31%	+11%	–	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	+13%	−22%	−14%	–	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	−10%	−21%	−8%	−13%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.9 kn	+27%	+84%	−25%	+17%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ICE HAWK SHIPPING COMPANY	1,886	6,029	10,978	1,062	10.3	172	97.2	–
2024	ICE HAWK SHIPPING COMPANY	1,945	6,182	10,962	1,023	10.7	177	90.0	–
2023	not published	2,149	6,832	12,210	1,366	8.9	176	89.5	–
2022	not published	2,093	6,639	13,981	1,793	7.8	150	73.9	–
2021	not published	2,032	6,451	12,641	2,280	5.5	161	82.4	–
2020	not published	2,086	6,614	14,698	1,818	8.1	142	62.3	–
2019	not published	2,530	8,021	16,006	1,737	9.2	158	71.4	–
2018	not published	2,652	8,398	21,247	3,350	6.3	125	61.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ICE HAWK SHIPPING COMPANY	97.2	7.95	+1,123%	1,663 of 1,665	Swiss Climate	A
2024	ICE HAWK SHIPPING COMPANY	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2023	not published	89.5	8.44	+960%	1,795 of 1,797	RINA	A
2022	not published	73.9	8.51	+769%	1,939 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2020	not published	62.3	9.03	+590%	1,840 of 1,870	RINA	A
2019	not published	71.4	8.83	+709%	1,894 of 1,919	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	61.0	8.86	+588%	1,752 of 1,779	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.