Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

AVEMAR DOS

IMO
9170183
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EEXI 32.45 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
156.7 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+4%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
5,747
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+914%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
5,664
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+2,137%)
Average speed
16.8 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+6%)
Fuel per day at sea
63.2 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,948 t
CO₂ emitted
19,071 t
19,363 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
37,959 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,259 h
94 days, 26% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 156.7 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+4%)
69.3Ranks 227 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 15.8 (+6%)
12.0Faster than 61% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 5,747.10 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+914%)
66.76Ranks 403 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 5,663.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+2,137%)
48.59Ranks 404 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports14%
  • From the EU43%
  • Into the EU39%
  • At berth in the EU4%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,269 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
4.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.3 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • AVEMAR DOS
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • AVEMAR DOS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • AVEMAR DOS
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • AVEMAR DOS
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.8 kn+17%+12%−32%+65%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+1.0 kn+1%+8%−18%−6%1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.2 kn−1%−2%+14%+0%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022−5.4 kn−14%−35%+61%−26%5.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+6.1 kn+21%+66%+20%+11%6.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.9 kn−17%−5%−58%+510,860%1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−14.2 kn+6%−47%+3%−100%14.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA5,94819,07137,9592,25916.8156.7––
2024Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA7,47623,96855,9443,17417.6133.6––
2023not published8,98128,79467,9504,10516.6132.2––
2022not published7,92125,39559,4173,54716.8133.3––
2021not published5,72118,34136,8481,65722.2155.3––
2020not published3,96512,71130,7981,90916.1128.7––
2019not published11,36136,42573,4945,18114.2154.6––
2018not published10,37433,26071,4142,51328.4145.3––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA5,747.10566.51+914%403 of 4085,663.69253.18+2,137%RINAA+B
2024Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA3,475.98546.68+536%377 of 4042,532.33232.85+988%RINAA+B
2023not published3,706.24680.04+445%380 of 3862,756.69233.94+1,078%RINA–
2022not published3,702.02626.32+491%387 of 3943,010.19252.90+1,090%RINAB
2021not published5,025.11815.19+516%371 of 3772,230.59226.00+887%RINAB
2020not published4,547.54750.91+506%373 of 3873,066.76217.49+1,310%RINAB
2019not published0.89569.03−100%8 of 3940.89222.56−100%RINAB
2018not published4,806.89728.92+559%344 of 3614,807.14184.05+2,512%RINAB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.