Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

IKEBANA

IMO: 9186209
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.24 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Masterbulk AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

108

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+207%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

11.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (−55%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

914 t

CO₂ emitted

2,896 t

2,941 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,460 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

887 h

37 days, 10% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 108 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+207%)

17.4Ranks 2,701 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 9.3 (+2%)

6.9Faster than 54% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 11.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−55%)

10.2Ranks 335 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU64%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU16%

60% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,726 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

449 t

15.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+45 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

IKEBANA
General cargo median

25.050.075.0100.0125.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

IKEBANA
General cargo median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

IKEBANA
General cargo median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−2.1 kn	+12%	−8%	−64%	−33%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−9%	−12%	+223%	+44%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	−8%	−15%	−66%	−14%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+0%	+7%	+91%	+20%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+15%	+19%	−41%	+1%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	+1%	−2%	−52%	−17%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Masterbulk AS	914	2,896	8,460	887	9.5	108	–	–
2023	not published	2,292	7,166	23,716	2,049	11.6	96.6	–	–
2022	not published	782	2,445	7,333	617	11.9	107	–	–
2021	not published	2,526	7,884	21,855	1,703	12.8	116	–	–
2020	not published	1,324	4,166	11,469	958	12.0	116	–	–
2019	not published	1,955	6,127	19,537	1,677	11.6	100	–	–
2018	not published	3,994	12,471	40,407	3,340	12.1	98.8	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Masterbulk AS	11.5	25.5	−55%	335 of 2,723	DNV	B
2023	not published	17.2	20.7	−17%	388 of 1,045	DNV	B
2022	not published	11.9	21.6	−45%	187 of 1,034	DNV	B
2021	not published	13.9	22.7	−39%	179 of 1,142	DNV	B
2020	not published	11.6	24.5	−53%	124 of 1,167	DNV	B
2019	not published	11.6	25.0	−54%	119 of 1,154	DNV	B
2018	not published	14.0	24.9	−44%	172 of 1,044	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.