Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SEA MOON

IMO: 9228227
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 12,192 t
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Chios
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.77 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GENIMAR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,192 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

49.0

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.90 (+60%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−9%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

520 t

CO₂ emitted

1,638 t

1,664 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

10,631 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,097 h

46 days, 13% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 49.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−41%)

61.0Ranks 76 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 10.7 (−9%)

8.8Faster than 21% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+60%)

4.80Ranks 3,026 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU15%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU6%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,017 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

96 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+26 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEA MOON
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEA MOON
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEA MOON
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.5 kn	−25%	+16%	+53%	−17%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−5.2 kn	+1%	−44%	+36%	+79%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−2%	−14%	−64%	−35%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	–	+4%	–	−43%	+16%
2020→2021	–	−9%	–	+30%	+2%
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−13%	−13%	+15%	−45%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	−16%	−10%	+11%	+48%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GENIMAR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.	520	1,638	10,631	1,097	9.7	49.0	12.6	–
2024	GENIMAR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.	453	1,415	6,963	1,116	6.2	65.1	15.2	–
2023	not published	329	1,046	5,118	450	11.4	64.3	8.50	–
2022	not published	933	2,947	14,190	1,105	12.8	65.7	13.1	–
2021	not published	1,577	4,974	24,907	0	–	63.3	11.3	–
2020	not published	1,326	4,161	19,163	1,701	11.3	69.2	11.0	–
2019	not published	1,323	4,127	16,601	1,474	11.3	79.7	20.0	–
2018	not published	1,416	4,438	14,962	1,430	10.5	94.6	13.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GENIMAR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.	12.6	7.90	+60%	3,026 of 3,611	EMICERT	A
2024	GENIMAR SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.	15.2	8.09	+88%	2,755 of 3,089	EMICERT	A
2023	not published	8.50	8.27	+3%	1,870 of 3,548	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	13.1	8.71	+50%	3,178 of 3,968	EMICERT	A
2021	not published	11.3	8.57	+32%	2,617 of 3,466	EMICERT	A
2020	not published	11.0	8.24	+34%	2,400 of 3,150	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	20.0	8.38	+139%	3,195 of 3,360	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	13.5	8.50	+59%	2,873 of 3,384	EMICERT	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.