Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

DOMINICA

IMO: 9232204
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Ership

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

63.8

General cargo median 35.2 kg/nm (+81%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

28.4

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.5 (+11%)

Average speed

9.8 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,995 t

CO₂ emitted

6,223 t

6,321 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

31,274 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,181 h

133 days, 36% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 63.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+81%)

17.4Ranks 2,143 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 9.8 kn · median 9.3 (+5%)

6.9Faster than 61% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 28.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (+11%)

10.2Ranks 1,631 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU11%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,348 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

664 t

10.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+98 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DOMINICA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DOMINICA
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

DOMINICA
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−16%	+26%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+1%	−8%	+6%	−5%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−4%	−11%	−14%	−7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	+8%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+0%	+8%	−20%	−20%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	−4%	+21%	−7%	−38%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+0%	−1%	+1%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Ership	1,995	6,223	31,274	3,181	9.8	63.8	–	–
2024	Ership	2,315	7,231	37,238	3,743	9.9	62.2	–	–
2023	not published	2,153	6,726	34,968	3,208	10.9	61.6	–	–
2022	not published	2,618	8,181	40,724	3,489	11.7	64.3	–	–
2021	not published	2,549	8,023	37,809	3,302	11.4	67.4	–	–
2020	not published	3,202	10,265	47,501	4,482	10.6	67.4	–	–
2019	not published	3,584	11,192	51,161	6,093	8.4	70.1	–	–
2018	not published	3,542	11,068	50,559	5,997	8.4	70.1	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Ership	28.4	25.5	+11%	1,631 of 2,723	DNV	A
2024	Ership	22.6	19.3	+17%	695 of 1,111	DNV	A
2023	not published	23.7	20.7	+15%	649 of 1,045	DNV	A
2022	not published	25.6	21.6	+19%	655 of 1,034	DNV	A
2021	not published	27.3	22.7	+20%	789 of 1,142	DNV	A
2020	not published	34.3	24.5	+40%	896 of 1,167	DNV	A
2019	not published	55.7	25.0	+123%	1,039 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	73.5	24.9	+195%	975 of 1,044	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.