Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

M/T KUZGUNCUK

IMO: 9235842
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 1,628 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: İStanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: KUZGUNCUK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anadoluhisarı Tankercilik A.S.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,628 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

49.3

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−40%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

95.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.6 (+169%)

Average speed

8.0 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−37%)

Fuel per day at sea

9.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

713 t

CO₂ emitted

2,255 t

2,290 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,475 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,815 h

76 days, 21% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 49.3 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−40%)

49.8Ranks 36 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 12.6 (−37%)

8.8Faster than 6% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 95.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+169%)

14.4Ranks 295 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU40%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU10%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,288 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

221 t

9.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+35 t

+1.6% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

M/T KUZGUNCUK
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

M/T KUZGUNCUK
Gas carrier (LPG) median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

M/T KUZGUNCUK
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.050.0100150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	+0%	+11%	+137%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−13%	−12%	+86%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.3 kn	−6%	−20%	+72%	−8%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.9 kn	+52%	+24%	−88%	+16%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 52%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	−10%	−22%	+224%	−27%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−2%	+4%	−45%	+65%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−25%	−33%	+159%	−44%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Anadoluhisarı Tankercilik A.S.	713	2,255	14,475	1,815	8.0	49.3	95.7	–
2024	Anadoluhisarı Tankercilik A.S.	300	952	6,097	851	7.2	49.2	–	–
2023	not published	186	590	3,275	459	7.1	56.8	107	–
2022	not published	114	363	1,903	225	8.4	60.2	117	–
2021	not published	646	2,045	16,291	1,589	10.3	39.6	101	–
2020	not published	222	702	5,026	424	11.8	44.1	137	–
2019	not published	411	1,292	9,106	821	11.1	45.1	83.0	–
2018	not published	212	665	3,519	285	12.3	60.2	148	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anadoluhisarı Tankercilik A.S.	95.7	35.6	+169%	295 of 355	ClassNK	A
2024	Anadoluhisarı Tankercilik A.S.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A
2023	not published	107	41.8	+156%	279 of 330	ClassNK	A
2022	not published	117	42.5	+174%	307 of 348	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	101	46.9	+115%	264 of 323	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	137	42.3	+225%	308 of 339	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	83.0	45.9	+81%	243 of 331	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	148	53.1	+179%	272 of 297	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.