Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

SYN ACRAB

IMO: 9251781
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 2,274 t
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Napoli
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.16 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Synergas srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,274 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

65.8

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

92.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.6 (+160%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

18.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,128 t

CO₂ emitted

6,805 t

6,910 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,325 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,740 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.8 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−19%)

49.8Ranks 77 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 12.6 (−6%)

8.8Faster than 36% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 92.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (+160%)

14.4Ranks 288 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's emissions by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports74%
From the EU10%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU12%

93% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,339 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

825 t

12.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

+105 t

+1.5% CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O; counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SYN ACRAB
Gas carrier (LPG) median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SYN ACRAB
Gas carrier (LPG) median

4.06.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SYN ACRAB
Gas carrier (LPG) median

25.050.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+2%	−5%	−4%	−5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.2 kn	−16%	+13%	+7%	−27%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	+12%	−12%	+4%	+29%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−11%	−5%	+16%	+7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+1%	−2%	+11%	−24%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.6 kn	+9%	+113%	−32%	+26%	5.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.1 kn	+16%	−15%	−20%	+12%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Synergas srl	2,128	6,805	32,325	2,740	11.8	65.8	92.6	–
2024	Synergas srl	2,186	6,943	33,765	2,693	12.5	64.8	97.9	–
2023	not published	2,432	7,671	31,499	3,385	9.3	77.2	134	–
2022	not published	2,099	6,636	30,404	2,571	11.8	69.0	104	–
2021	not published	2,027	6,411	26,185	2,347	11.2	77.4	97.1	–
2020	not published	1,811	5,736	23,623	2,057	11.5	76.7	127	–
2019	not published	2,437	7,662	34,679	5,887	5.9	70.3	100	–
2018	not published	2,609	8,187	43,099	5,381	8.0	60.5	89.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Synergas srl	92.6	35.6	+160%	288 of 355	Bureau Veritas	A+C
2024	Synergas srl	97.9	35.8	+173%	258 of 306	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	134	41.8	+220%	301 of 330	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	104	42.5	+144%	290 of 348	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	97.1	46.9	+107%	261 of 323	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	127	42.3	+200%	300 of 339	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	100	45.9	+119%	272 of 331	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	89.4	53.1	+68%	205 of 297	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.