Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ENERGY SPIRIT

IMO: 9269207
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 10.84 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG
Former names: GLOBAL ENERGY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

236.3 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

22.81

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+220%)

Average speed

7.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−48%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,375 t

CO₂ emitted

30,949 t

36,723 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

48,129 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,418 h

267 days, 73% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 236.3 kg/nm · median 190.4 (+24%)

152.1Ranks 283 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 7.5 kn · median 14.4 (−48%)

11.2Faster than 2% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 22.81 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+220%)

5.06Ranks 359 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU62%
Into the EU20%
At berth in the EU18%

59% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (18,201 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

17.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

194.3 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.187

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ENERGY SPIRIT
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ENERGY SPIRIT
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ENERGY SPIRIT
LNG carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.8 kn	−21%	−43%	+8%	+1%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	−24%	−8%	+30%	−26%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	+20%	+45%	−22%	+16%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+4%	+2%	+11%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.5 kn	−4%	−21%	−5%	+9%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+8%	+12%	+23%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+2.1 kn	−15%	+14%	−21%	−16%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	11,375	30,949	48,129	6,418	7.5	236.3	–	–
2024LNG	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	13,334	36,443	44,443	4,298	10.3	300.0	–	–
2023LNG	not published	13,517	37,296	34,133	3,996	8.5	396.0	–	–
2022LNG	not published	14,493	39,988	43,802	6,213	7.1	330.9	–	–
2021LNG	not published	12,521	34,832	39,360	5,489	7.2	318.1	–	35%
2020LNG	not published	13,781	38,241	41,585	4,783	8.7	331.4	–	41%
2019LNG	not published	10,367	28,682	33,844	4,034	8.4	306.3	–	15%
2018LNG	not published	15,354	42,322	42,802	6,836	6.3	358.7	–	36%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	22.81	7.12	+220%	359 of 386	ClassNK	B+C
2024LNG	FLEET MANAGEMENT LIMITED	22.62	7.39	+206%	290 of 312	ClassNK	B+C
2023LNG	not published	30.56	9.10	+236%	338 of 355	ClassNK	B+C
2022LNG	not published	26.41	10.38	+154%	341 of 379	Verifavia	B+C
2021LNG	not published	29.42	10.46	+181%	272 of 289	Verifavia	B+C
2020LNG	not published	26.90	10.71	+151%	257 of 267	Verifavia	B+C
2019LNG	not published	24.75	10.87	+128%	230 of 248	Verifavia	B+C
2018LNG	not published	29.36	10.92	+169%	190 of 197	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.