Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC TIANJIN

IMO: 9285471
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,586 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,586 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

273.0 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−12%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

90.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,765 t

CO₂ emitted

43,151 t

43,827 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

50,430 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,659 h

152 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 273.0 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+54%)

78.8Ranks 1,819 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.8 kn · median 13.3 (+4%)

9.1Faster than 57% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−12%)

7.22Ranks 965 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU55%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU6%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (26,789 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC TIANJIN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC TIANJIN
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC TIANJIN
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+5%	+5%	+4%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.2 kn	+7%	+26%	+17%	+1%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.9 kn	−12%	−30%	−9%	+11%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	−1%	−10%	+125%	+5%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−7%	+1%	−70%	−24%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	+157%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13,765	43,151	50,430	3,659	13.8	273.0	14.36	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	12,601	39,327	48,592	3,528	13.8	259.3	15.31	–
2023	not published	10,057	31,480	41,457	3,560	11.6	242.6	15.16	–
2022	not published	12,638	39,639	45,697	3,144	14.5	276.6	13.61	–
2021	not published	5,704	17,910	20,342	1,273	16.0	280.4	12.93	–
2020	not published	20,503	63,971	67,929	4,601	14.8	301.8	16.97	–
2019	not published	7,829	24,523	26,383	1,797	14.7	296.7	17.62	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	14.36	16.30	−12%	965 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	15.31	17.52	−13%	839 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	15.16	19.40	−22%	735 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	13.61	19.13	−29%	608 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	12.93	17.90	−28%	543 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	16.97	17.58	−3%	855 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	17.62	18.88	−7%	821 of 1,788	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.