Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Segment

Container ships, 2025

2,431 container ships reported to THETIS-MRV for 2025, emitting 53.7 Mt of CO₂. Efficiency is measured as g CO₂/t·nm.

The segment at a glance

Median ship
16.3
g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel per mile
177 kg
Median ship
Average speed
13.3 kn
Median ship, distance over hours at sea
Hours at sea
3,169
Median ship, EU-scope voyages (36% of the year)
CO₂ at berth
3.1%
Share emitted alongside in EU ports
Ships burning LNG
133
of 2,208 benchmarked

Operators

Who runs container ships in EU trades, and how their fleets compare. Technical shows efficiency, speed and time at sea; commercial shows the allowance bill.

#Group
1MSC Group3 companies, 2 in container536−12%14.321712.92,6654.0%57
2Maersk2 companies179−35%10.622314.73,7411.3%4
3CMA CGM5 companies196−14%14.021312.32,9624.3%29
4COSCO Shipping10 companies, 3 in container79−46%8.828014.93,9831.9%–
5Hapag-Lloyd AG63−53%7.628015.63,6541.9%12
6Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.88−39%9.920914.42,2681.9%8
7Evergreen2 companies, 1 in container34−49%8.331117.32,8622.1%1
8TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB40−3%15.918713.13,3023.4%–
9HMM2 companies41−54%7.523811.82,5853.6%2
10Anglo-Eastern10 companies, 2 in container33+3%16.919113.13,5103.4%–
11ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD28−38%10.121013.93,0752.0%–
12Zodiac2 companies, 1 in container20−49%8.323813.93,5761.8%–
13Synergy Marine15 companies, 4 in container13−39%10.027115.53,0370.9%–
14Peter Dohle Schiffahrts-KG26+58%25.813214.54,5892.7%–
15Eastern Pacific Shipping2 companies20−37%10.321014.93,4053.8%7
16Shoei2 companies11−50%8.129214.04,2422.6%–
17COSTAMARE SHIPPING COMPANY S.A18−28%11.826114.41,9664.9%–
18Offen Group13 companies13+4%16.925615.12,3842.3%–
19Arkas2 companies46+78%29.010410.62,1494.1%–
20Danaos2 companies, 1 in container230%16.317212.72,3034.0%–
21ZIM8 companies14+10%17.916513.93,0722.9%–
22HL Crewmanagement GmbH24+4%17.015712.55,4543.1%–
23Columbia Shipmanagement3 companies25+83%29.811011.22,8913.5%–
24NYK5 companies, 1 in container11−33%11.020012.33,2712.6%–
25ASM Maritime BV13−4%15.716412.82,8683.4%–

Operators with at least 3 ships in this segment. Figures cover their ships in this segment only, so a group active in several segments (MSC runs container and cruise ships) has its full total on the market page. Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership; tell us at info@navalyze.com if one is in the wrong group. Click a column to rank by it.

Efficiency by ship size

Bigger ships move a tonne of cargo for less fuel, so ships are compared within size bands. Each row is drawn against the segment median.

0.25×0.5×segment median2×4×
  • <10k t44.8 g CO₂/t·nm
  • 10–30k t22.2 g CO₂/t·nm
  • 30–60k t14.4 g CO₂/t·nm
  • 60–100k t10.3 g CO₂/t·nm
  • >100k t7.11 g CO₂/t·nm

Who verifies the reports

Accredited verifiers check each ship's MRV report. Their share of the segment's ships and CO₂.

Share of CO₂Share of ships

How fuel is measured

Each ship's monitoring plan names one or more of the four MRV methods.

A · Bunker delivery notes
38%
Fuel bought, corrected by tank soundings
B · Bunker tank monitoring
43%
Tank readings on board
C · Flow meters
56%
Meters on the fuel lines to engines and boilers
D · Direct measurement
0%
CO₂ measured in the exhaust

Most common combinations

  • A30%
  • B + C28%
  • C21%
  • B13%
  • A + C5%
  • A + B1%
  • A + B + C1%

Share of 2,578 emission reports that name a method; a report can name several.

Notes

  • Medians and rankings use 2,208 full-year reports with fuel; part-year and zero-fuel reports count towards totals only.
  • THETIS reports time at sea on EU-scope voyages only, not time in port. CO₂ at berth is the closest measure of port activity it publishes.
  • Speed and distance are derived from the published ratios; THETIS has no distance column.