Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Anglo-Eastern
Ships136
CO₂ emitted1.5 Mt−28.7%
Fuel per mile132 kg/nm
Average speed12.1 kn
CO₂ at berth4.4%
Ships burning LNG1
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Anglo-Eastern16.9 (+3%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Anglo-Eastern3316.9+3%19113.13,5103.4%–
Segment median 16.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Anglo-Eastern6.5 (−17%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Anglo-Eastern386.5−17%10510.21,8443.1%–
Segment median 7.90%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Anglo-Eastern12.8 (−15%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Anglo-Eastern3512.8−15%6811.81,7807.1%1
Segment median 15.00%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • Anglo-Eastern17.8 (−50%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Anglo-Eastern1317.8−50%8813.52,6013.6%–
Segment median 35.60%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Anglo-Eastern6.7 (−15%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Anglo-Eastern146.7−15%12011.21,7198.0%–
Segment median 8.00%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5

  • Anglo-Eastern9.1 (−64%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Anglo-Eastern19.1−64%8110.92,9123.5%–
Segment median 25.50%

Passenger

CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 1,819

  • Anglo-Eastern1,503 (−17%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Anglo-Eastern11,503−17%608.41,24011.3%–
Segment median 1,8190%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Anglo-EasternABS (135), DNV (2)2%93%99%0%

Anglo-Eastern: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
COYHAIQUE9687588Container46.5 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+109%14.6678 t€18k
VALENCIA EXPRESS9108130Container38.6 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+74%13.425,837 t€1.2m
MAERSK ROUBAIX9332688Container70.7 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+58%5.11,535 t€39k
CISNES9687576Container21.2 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+47%13.413,124 t€354k
ON PHOENIX9893228Oil tanker14.8 g CO₂/t·nm10.4+42%11.78,139 t€247k
NAJWA9615561Bulk carrier9.2 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+40%9.65,488 t€76k
GCL GOMTI9939943Bulk carrier6.7 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+39%9.915,070 t€402k
MINERAL HONSHU9614892Bulk carrier6.5 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+34%8.83,705 t€120k
EASTERN ZINNIA9624093Bulk carrier12.5 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+32%9.44,649 t€130k
GCL MAHI9939955Bulk carrier6.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+27%10.113,077 t€343k
BOCHEM LONDON9743849Chemical tanker26.5 g CO₂/t·nm21.4+24%12.23,877 t€144k
MAERSK GIRONDE9235555Container17.8 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+24%12.127,245 t€1.2m
GCL KRISHNA9939931Bulk carrier6.0 g CO₂/t·nm4.8+24%10.311,951 t€310k
YM RESPECT9937218Bulk carrier11.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+23%11.93,654 t€105k
SEOUL EXPRESS9193305Container17.2 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+20%16.54,847 t€152k
GINGA SUNBIRD9926568Chemical tanker13.8 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+20%11.82,061 t€73k
BWEK TAHITI9506186Gas carrier (LPG)138 g CO₂/t·nm117+18%12.07,929 t€153k
CHEMROAD SEA9565730Chemical tanker13.5 g CO₂/t·nm11.5+17%11.87,663 t€246k
LIVERPOOL EXPRESS9232565Container25.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+16%12.638,337 t€1.1m
CORCOVADO9687564Container16.5 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+15%14.915,053 t€404k
TOKYO EXPRESS9193290Container25.4 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+15%16.54,464 t€126k
ORIENTAL JUBILEE9763813Gas carrier (LPG)16.4 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+14%12.94,158 t€114k
FAIRCHEM SWORD9673678Chemical tanker44.3 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+13%13.21,972 t€65k
SINBAD9413688Oil tanker5.2 g CO₂/t·nm4.6+13%10.56,744 t€183k
DUBLIN EXPRESS9232577Container24.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+12%12.741,656 t€1.2m
YM COURAGE9959943Bulk carrier10.6 g CO₂/t·nm9.5+12%11.71,750 t€53k
YANTIAN EXPRESS9229831Container16.0 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+12%14.563,403 t€1.6m
KOBE EXPRESS9143544Container16.0 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+12%13.826,848 t€771k
BOA9623764Bulk carrier7.3 g CO₂/t·nm6.6+12%8.24,267 t€125k
KALAHARI EXPRESS9400095Container16.0 g CO₂/t·nm14.4+11%14.044,040 t€1.3m

30 of 138 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.